These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
139 related items for PubMed ID: 22628971
1. Ultra-morphology of root surface subsequent to periodontal instrumentation: A scanning electron microscope study. Dahiya P, Kamal R. J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 16(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 22628971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of hand and power-driven instruments on root surface characteristics: A scanning electron microscopy study. Dahiya P, Kamal R, Gupta R, Pandit N. Contemp Clin Dent; 2011 Apr; 2(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 21957380 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using manual, ultrasonic and rotary instruments: an in vitro study using scanning electron microscopy. Marda P, Prakash S, Devaraj CG, Vastardis S. Indian J Dent Res; 2012 Apr; 23(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 22945704 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysing root roughness and smear layer relationship by comparing contemporary dental curettes with conventional dental curettes: a randomised controlled trial. Riaz S, Ahmed S, Shabbir S, Khan ZR, Zaidi SJA, Naeem MM, Farooqui WA. BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jun 17; 22(1):237. PubMed ID: 35715802 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the effects of periodontal rotary instruments and Gracey curettes on root surface characteristics: an in vivo SEM study. Dwivedi S, Verma SJ. Quintessence Int; 2012 Jun 17; 43(10):e135-40. PubMed ID: 23115772 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Root Surface Roughness Produced By Hand Instruments and Ultrasonic Scalers: An Invitro Study. Kumar P, Das SJ, Sonowal ST, Chawla J. J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Nov 17; 9(11):ZC56-60. PubMed ID: 26675445 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative scanning electron microscopy study between hand instrument, ultrasonic scaling and erbium doped:Yttirum aluminum garnet laser on root surface: A morphological and thermal analysis. Mishra MK, Prakash S. Contemp Clin Dent; 2013 Apr 17; 4(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 24015009 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the effects of various periodontal rotary instruments on surface characteristics of root surface. Kishida M, Sato S, Ito K. J Oral Sci; 2004 Mar 17; 46(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15141717 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of various ultrasonic and hand instruments on the root surfaces of human single rooted teeth: A Planimetric and Profilometric study. Mittal A, Nichani AS, Venugopal R, Rajani V. J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2014 Mar 17; 18(6):710-7. PubMed ID: 25624626 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the effects of different instrumentation techniques on root surface roughness and cement loss using micro-computerized tomography: An in-vitro study. Karacaoglu F, Orhan K. Int J Dent Hyg; 2022 May 17; 20(2):339-346. PubMed ID: 34390126 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study. Solís Moreno C, Santos A, Nart J, Levi P, Velásquez A, Sanz Moliner J. J Periodontal Res; 2012 Oct 17; 47(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 22494068 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Root surface changes following manual and ultrasonic instrumentation - a scanning electron microscopic study. Wasti J, Ravishankar PL, Wasti A, Rajula MPB, Sunanda K, Alzahrani KJ, Alharif KF, Halawani IF, Alzahrani FM, Baeshen HA, Abulhamael AM, Patil S. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Jun 17; 27(12):5415-5420. PubMed ID: 37401276 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro comparison of root surface roughness and bacterial adhesion following treatment with three different instruments. Haroon F, Gregory RL, Hara A, Blanchard SB, Hamada Y. J Periodontol; 2022 May 17; 93(5):e83-e91. PubMed ID: 34338309 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultramorphology of the root surface subsequent to hand-ultrasonic simultaneous instrumentation during non-surgical periodontal treatments: an in vitro study. Aspriello SD, Piemontese M, Levrini L, Sauro S. J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 May 17; 19(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21437474 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro evaluation of surface roughness, adhesion of periodontal ligament fibroblasts, and Streptococcus gordonii following root instrumentation with Gracey curettes and subsequent polishing with diamond-coated curettes. Eick S, Bender P, Flury S, Lussi A, Sculean A. Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Mar 17; 17(2):397-404. PubMed ID: 22526889 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of manual, magnetostrictive and piezoelectric ultrasonic instruments--an in vitro profilometric and SEM study. Singh S, Uppoor A, Nayak D. J Appl Oral Sci; 2012 Feb 17; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 22437673 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Root surface alterations following manual and mechanical scaling: A comparative study. Maritato M, Orazi L, Laurito D, Formisano G, Serra E, Lollobrigida M, Molinari A, De Biase A. Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 Nov 17; 16(4):553-558. PubMed ID: 29797806 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of a new ultrasonic scaler on fibroblast attachment to root surfaces: a scanning electron microscopy analysis. Kishida M, Sato S, Ito K. J Periodontal Res; 2004 Apr 17; 39(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 15009519 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How does the novel piezoelectric 11 Gracey Curette compare to Gracey Curette or piezoelectric scaler? Kumar S. Evid Based Dent; 2022 Sep 17; 23(3):108-109. PubMed ID: 36151284 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro comparative study of a reciprocating scaler for root surface debridement. Lee A, Heasman PA, Kelly PJ. J Dent; 1996 Sep 17; 24(1-2):81-6. PubMed ID: 8636498 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]