These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

171 related items for PubMed ID: 2264016

  • 1. Impression technique for RPDs. A comparison between two methods.
    Gunne J, Högström J, Nilson H.
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(5):225-31. PubMed ID: 2264016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J, Palmer R, Howe L, Wilson R.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S, Moore BK, Barco MT, Hovijitra S, Brown DT, Andres CJ.
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics.
    Drago CJ.
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 14508741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Mixed impressions (alginate and zinc oxide eugenol) in posterior bilaterally edentulous patients].
    Braun AA, de Vargas HM, Weigert F, Mazzaquatro W.
    Rev Gaucha Odontol; 1975 Sep; 23(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 802326
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparative study of impression procedures for distal extension removable partial dentures.
    Madihalli AU, Tavane PN, Yadav NS, Abraham S, Reddy PM, Baiju G.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Sep 01; 12(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 22269192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Impressions in removable partial dentures].
    Prapotnich R, Domken O.
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2001 Sep 01; 56(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 16193853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The altered cast impression technique: anatomic and functional considerations.
    Stillwell KD.
    Todays FDA; 2009 Aug 01; 21(8):19-21, 23. PubMed ID: 19728461
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Quality of written communication and master impressions for fabrication of removable partial prostheses in the Kingdom of Bahrain.
    Radhi A, Lynch CD, Hannigan A.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Feb 01; 34(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 17244238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Reproducibility of interocclusal recording for mandibular removable partial denture in bilateral distal extension cases.
    Togano H, Hideshima M, Ohyama T.
    J Med Dent Sci; 2003 Mar 01; 50(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12715920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Extension of zinc oxide-eugenol paste impressions.
    Owall B.
    Sven Tandlak Tidskr; 1971 Oct 01; 64(10):673-9. PubMed ID: 4950176
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.