These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
318 related items for PubMed ID: 22640678
1. Skeletal and dental outcomes of a new magnetic functional appliance, the Sydney Magnoglide, in Class II correction. Phelan A, Tarraf NE, Taylor P, Hönscheid R, Drescher D, Baccetti T, Darendeliler MA. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):759-72. PubMed ID: 22640678 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Short-term skeletal and dental effects of the Xbow appliance as measured on lateral cephalograms. Flores-Mir C, Barnett G, Higgins DW, Heo G, Major PW. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):822-32. PubMed ID: 19962605 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes. Wigal TG, Dischinger T, Martin C, Razmus T, Gunel E, Ngan P. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel. Freeman DC, McNamara JA, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Fränkel C. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):570.e1-6; discussion 570-1. PubMed ID: 19409337 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Berger JL, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, George C, Kaczynski R. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparision of Twin-block and Forsus (FRD) functional appliance--a cephalometric study. Mahamad IK, Neela PK, Mascarenhas R, Husain A. Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012 Apr; 23(3):49-58. PubMed ID: 23094559 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Twin-block and Dynamax appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusion in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. Thiruvenkatachari B, Sandler J, Murray A, Walsh T, O'Brien K. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):144.e1-9; discussion 144-5. PubMed ID: 20691354 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance. Purkayastha SK, Rabie AB, Wong R. World J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment of developing Class II Division 1 malocclusion with Jumper Twin Block. Hammad SM, Bashir ES, El-Bialy AA. Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012 Aug; 23(2):51-6. PubMed ID: 22873025 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes. Gill DS, Lee RT. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):465-72; quiz 517. PubMed ID: 15821691 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of early preorthodontic trainer treatment on Class II, division 1 patients. Usumez S, Uysal T, Sari Z, Basciftci FA, Karaman AI, Guray E. Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):605-9. PubMed ID: 15529493 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment. de Oliveira JN, Rodrigues de Almeida R, Rodrigues de Almeida M, de Oliveira JN. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel approach for treatment of mandibular deficiency with vertical growth pattern. Jamilian A, Showkatbakhsh R, Rad AT. Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012 Jul; 23(2):23-7. PubMed ID: 22873020 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study. Lohrmann B, Schwestka-Polly R, Nägerl H, Ihlow D, Kubein-Meesenburg D. Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition. de Almeida MR, Henriques JF, de Almeida RR, Weber U, McNamara JA. Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):540-7. PubMed ID: 16097222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a modified anterior inclined plane in the treatment on the dentoskeletal Class II division 2 patient. Rao SA, Thomas AM, Chopra S. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010 Jul; 28(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 21157062 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of the Sander bite-jumping appliance in growing patients with mandibular retrusion: a randomized controlled trial. Martina R, Cioffi I, Galeotti A, Tagliaferri R, Cimino R, Michelotti A, Valletta R, Farella M, Paduano S. Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 May; 16(2):116-26. PubMed ID: 23323608 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study. Nelson B, Hansen K, Hägg U. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. R-appliance: a different design in functional therapy in Class II Division I malocclusion. Jamilian A, Showkatbakhsh R, Kamali Z. Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2009 Aug; 20(2):11-4. PubMed ID: 19739496 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes. Marşan G. Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]