These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

518 related items for PubMed ID: 22658389

  • 1. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
    Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Trevino J, Ramesh J, Varadarajulu S.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):321-7. PubMed ID: 22658389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ, Yim H, Hwang JC, Lee D, Kim YB, Lim SG, Kim SS, Kang JK, Yoo BM, Kim JH.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep 29; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. 22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms.
    Jiang H, Guo J, Wang K, Zhu H, Chen J, Xu C, Wang D, Jin Z.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan 29; 54(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30731044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Randomized Trial Comparing the Flexible 19G and 25G Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions.
    Ramesh J, Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Trevino J, Eltoum I, Frost A, Hasan MK, Logue A, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S.
    Pancreas; 2015 Jan 29; 44(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 25232713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses.
    Nakai Y, Isayama H, Chang KJ, Yamamoto N, Hamada T, Uchino R, Mizuno S, Miyabayashi K, Yamamoto K, Kawakubo K, Kogure H, Sasaki T, Hirano K, Tanaka M, Tada M, Fukayama M, Koike K.
    Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Jul 29; 59(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 24429514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A, Wani S, Triantafyllou K, Tziatzios G, Cannizzaro R, Muscatiello N, Singh S.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec 29; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions.
    Iwashita T, Nakai Y, Samarasena JB, Park DH, Zhang Z, Gu M, Lee JG, Chang KJ.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun 29; 77(6):909-15. PubMed ID: 23433596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L, Tang AL, Zhang L, Liu XW, Li JB, Wang F, Shen SR, Wang XY.
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug 29; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
    Lee YN, Moon JH, Kim HK, Choi HJ, Choi MH, Kim DC, Lee TH, Cha SW, Cho YD, Park SH.
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec 29; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017.
    Polkowski M, Jenssen C, Kaye P, Carrara S, Deprez P, Gines A, Fernández-Esparrach G, Eisendrath P, Aithal GP, Arcidiacono P, Barthet M, Bastos P, Fornelli A, Napoleon B, Iglesias-Garcia J, Seicean A, Larghi A, Hassan C, van Hooft JE, Dumonceau JM.
    Endoscopy; 2017 Oct 29; 49(10):989-1006. PubMed ID: 28898917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study.
    Rodrigues-Pinto E, Jalaj S, Grimm IS, Baron TH.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec 29; 84(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 27345131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Randomized trial comparing the Franseen and Fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
    Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jun 29; 87(6):1432-1438. PubMed ID: 29305893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Assessment of the technical performance of the flexible 19-gauge EUS-FNA needle.
    Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug 29; 76(2):336-43. PubMed ID: 22817786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.