These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

518 related items for PubMed ID: 22658389

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
    Hedenström P, Demir A, Khodakaram K, Nilsson O, Sadik R.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Cheng B, Zhang Y, Chen Q, Sun B, Deng Z, Shan H, Dou L, Wang J, Li Y, Yang X, Jiang T, Xu G, Wang G.
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 28733257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions: a single-center prospective pilot study (MOSE study).
    Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Mukai T, Doi S, Nakashima M, Uemura S, Mabuchi M, Shimizu M, Hatano Y, Hara A, Moriwaki H.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Jan; 81(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 25440688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Prospective Study for Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using 25- and 22-Gauge Core Biopsy Needles in Solid Pancreatic Masses.
    Park SW, Chung MJ, Lee SH, Lee HS, Lee HJ, Park JY, Park SW, Song SY, Kim H, Chung JB, Bang S.
    PLoS One; 2016 Jan; 11(5):e0154401. PubMed ID: 27149404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. A comparison between 25-gauge and 22-gauge Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic and peripancreatic masses: a randomized non-inferiority study.
    Oh D, Kong J, Ko SW, Hong SM, So H, Hwang JS, Song TJ, Lee SK, Kim MH, Lee SS.
    Endoscopy; 2021 Nov; 53(11):1122-1129. PubMed ID: 33652495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
    Yousri M, Abusinna E, Tahoun N, Okasha HH, El-Habashi AH.
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun 01; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
    Di Mitri R, Mocciaro F, Antonini F, Scimeca D, Conte E, Bonaccorso A, Scibetta N, Unti E, Fornelli A, Giorgini S, Binda C, Macarri G, Larghi A, Fabbri C.
    Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb 01; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF, Larghi A, Bernardoni L, Parisi A, Frulloni L, Gabbrielli A, Parcesepe P, Scarpa A, Manfrin E.
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar 01; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in solid masses.
    Vilmann P, Săftoiu A, Hollerbach S, Skov BG, Linnemann D, Popescu CF, Wellmann A, Gorunescu F, Clementsen P, Freund U, Flemming P, Hassan H, Gheonea DI, Streba L, Ioncică AM, Streba CT.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jul 01; 48(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 23795663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
    Bang JY, Kirtane S, Krall K, Navaneethan U, Hasan M, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S.
    Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar 01; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy.
    Li Z, Liu W, Xu X, Li P.
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2022 Sep 01; 56(8):668-678. PubMed ID: 35470294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The difference in histological yield between 19G EUS-FNA and EUS-fine-needle biopsy needles.
    Ang TL, Li JW, Kwek ABE, Thurairajah PH, Wang LM.
    Endosc Ultrasound; 2019 Sep 01; 8(4):255-260. PubMed ID: 31115385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.