These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
78 related items for PubMed ID: 22667655
1. Large-scale generic test stand for testing of multiple configurations of air filters utilizing a range of particle size distributions. Giffin PK, Parsons MS, Unz RJ, Waggoner CA. Rev Sci Instrum; 2012 May; 83(5):055105. PubMed ID: 22667655 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. High-efficiency particulate air filter test stand and aerosol generator for particle loading studies. Arunkumar R, Hogancamp KU, Parsons MS, Rogers DM, Norton OP, Nagel BA, Alderman SL, Waggoner CA. Rev Sci Instrum; 2007 Aug; 78(8):085105. PubMed ID: 17764353 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the effect of media velocity on filter efficiency and most penetrating particle size of nuclear grade high-efficiency particulate air filters. Alderman SL, Parsons MS, Hogancamp KU, Waggoner CA. J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):713-20. PubMed ID: 18726819 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of pressure drop and filtration efficiency of particulate respirators using welding fumes and sodium chloride. Cho HW, Yoon CS, Lee JH, Lee SJ, Viner A, Johnson EW. Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jul; 55(6):666-80. PubMed ID: 21742627 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air. Cohen BS, Heikkinen MS, Hazi Y, Gao H, Peters P, Lippmann M. Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A test stand for the evaluation of high efficiency mist eliminators. Giffin PK, Parsons MS, Waggoner CA. Rev Sci Instrum; 2012 Oct; 83(10):105107. PubMed ID: 23126804 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers. Harper M, Akbar MZ, Andrew ME. J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. "Worst-case" aerosol testing parameters: III. Initial penetration of charged and neutralized lead fume and silica dust aerosols through clean, unloaded respirator filters. Moyer ES, Stevens GA. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 May; 50(5):271-4. PubMed ID: 2543198 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the filtration performance of NIOSH-approved N95 filtering facepiece respirators by photometric and number-based test methods. Rengasamy S, Miller A, Eimer BC. J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Jan; 8(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 21154105 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. "Worst case" aerosol testing parameters: II. Efficiency dependence of commercial respirator filters on humidity pretreatment. Moyer ES, Stevens GA. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 May; 50(5):265-70. PubMed ID: 2729102 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source. Witschger O, Grinshpun SA, Fauvel S, Basso G. Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Aerosol penetration through filtering facepieces and respirator cartridges. Chen CC, Lehtimäki M, Willeke K. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Sep; 53(9):566-74. PubMed ID: 1524031 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental methods to determine inhalability and personal sampler performance for aerosols in ultra-low windspeed environments. Schmees DK, Wu YH, Vincent JH. J Environ Monit; 2008 Dec; 10(12):1426-36. PubMed ID: 19037484 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]