These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

147 related items for PubMed ID: 22673754

  • 1. Bacterial viability on surface-modified resin-based dental restorative materials.
    Rüttermann S, Bergmann N, Beikler T, Raab WH, Janda R.
    Arch Oral Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(11):1512-21. PubMed ID: 22673754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A new approach to influence contact angle and surface free energy of resin-based dental restorative materials.
    Rüttermann S, Trellenkamp T, Bergmann N, Raab WH, Ritter H, Janda R.
    Acta Biomater; 2011 Mar; 7(3):1160-5. PubMed ID: 20933616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of osteopontin on the initial adhesion of dental bacteria.
    Schlafer S, Meyer RL, Sutherland DS, Städler B.
    J Nat Prod; 2012 Dec 28; 75(12):2108-12. PubMed ID: 23167781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.
    Aykent F, Yondem I, Ozyesil AG, Gunal SK, Avunduk MC, Ozkan S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr 28; 103(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20362765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Bacterial viability and physical properties of antibacterially modified experimental dental resin composites.
    Rüttermann S, Trellenkamp T, Bergmann N, Beikler T, Ritter H, Janda R.
    PLoS One; 2013 Apr 28; 8(11):e79119. PubMed ID: 24223890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biofilm-induced changes to the composite surface.
    Nedeljkovic I, De Munck J, Ungureanu AA, Slomka V, Bartic C, Vananroye A, Clasen C, Teughels W, Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt KL.
    J Dent; 2017 Aug 28; 63():36-43. PubMed ID: 28554609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Streptococcal adhesion to novel low-shrink silorane-based restorative.
    Buergers R, Schneider-Brachert W, Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Handel G.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb 28; 25(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 18768217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The influence of oral bacteria on the surfaces of resin-based dental restorative materials--an in vitro study.
    Willershausen B, Callaway A, Ernst CP, Stender E.
    Int Dent J; 1999 Aug 28; 49(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 10858759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of in vitro Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces naeslundii attachment and growth on restorative materials surfaces.
    Wei CX, Leung WK, Burrow MF.
    Aust Dent J; 2019 Dec 28; 64(4):365-375. PubMed ID: 31442307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Contact angle and surface free energy of experimental resin-based dental restorative materials after chewing simulation.
    Rüttermann S, Beikler T, Janda R.
    Dent Mater; 2014 Jun 28; 30(6):702-7. PubMed ID: 24768134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins.
    Mei L, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC, Ren Y.
    Dent Mater; 2011 Aug 28; 27(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 21524789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of salivary biofilm on the adherence of oral bacteria to bleached and non-bleached restorative material.
    Steinberg D, Mor C, Dogan H, Zacks B, Rotstein I.
    Dent Mater; 1999 Jan 28; 15(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 10483391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion on composite resin surfaces after different finishing and polishing techniques.
    Pereira CA, Eskelson E, Cavalli V, Liporoni PC, Jorge AO, do Rego MA.
    Oper Dent; 2011 Jan 28; 36(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 21740238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effects of surface roughness of composite resin on biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans in the presence of saliva.
    Park JW, Song CW, Jung JH, Ahn SJ, Ferracane JL.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Jan 28; 37(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 22339385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. In situ evaluation of a new silorane-based composite resin's bioadhesion properties.
    Claro-Pereira D, Sampaio-Maia B, Ferreira C, Rodrigues A, Melo LF, Vasconcelos MR.
    Dent Mater; 2011 Dec 28; 27(12):1238-45. PubMed ID: 22005004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Influence of saliva substitute films on initial Streptococcus mutans adhesion to enamel and dental substrata.
    Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Handel G, Bürgers R.
    J Dent; 2008 Dec 28; 36(12):977-83. PubMed ID: 18789569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Influence of surface properties of resin-based composites on in vitro Streptococcus mutans biofilm development.
    Ionescu A, Wutscher E, Brambilla E, Schneider-Feyrer S, Giessibl FJ, Hahnel S.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2012 Oct 28; 120(5):458-65. PubMed ID: 22985005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Streptococcus mutans biofilm changes surface-topography of resin composites.
    Beyth N, Bahir R, Matalon S, Domb AJ, Weiss EI.
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jun 28; 24(6):732-6. PubMed ID: 17897707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Transient acid-impairment of growth ability of oral Streptococcus, Actinomyces, and Lactobacillus: a possible ecological determinant in dental plaque.
    Horiuchi M, Washio J, Mayanagi H, Takahashi N.
    Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2009 Aug 28; 24(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 19572895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. In vivo study of the initial bacterial adhesion on different implant materials.
    Al-Ahmad A, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Fackler A, Follo M, Hellwig E, Bächle M, Hannig C, Han JS, Wolkewitz M, Kohal R.
    Arch Oral Biol; 2013 Sep 28; 58(9):1139-47. PubMed ID: 23694907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.