These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

210 related items for PubMed ID: 22675963

  • 1. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency in infertile women: an observational study.
    De Felice C, Rech F, Marini A, Stagnitti A, Valente F, Cipolla V, Borgogni G, Meggiorini ML.
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2012; 39(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 22675963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Fallopian tubal patency diagnosed by magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography.
    Ma L, Wu G, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Wang J, Li L, Zhou W.
    J Reprod Med; 2012; 57(9-10):435-40. PubMed ID: 23091993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Feasibility of dynamic MR-hysterosalpingography for the diagnostic work-up of infertile women.
    Winter L, Glücker T, Steimann S, Fröhlich JM, Steinbrich W, De Geyter C, Pegios W.
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):693-701. PubMed ID: 20482222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Three-dimensional dynamic MR-hysterosalpingography; a new, low invasive, radiation-free and less painful radiological approach to female infertility.
    Unterweger M, De Geyter C, Fröhlich JM, Bongartz G, Wiesner W.
    Hum Reprod; 2002 Dec; 17(12):3138-41. PubMed ID: 12456613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison between magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography and conventional hysterosalpingography: direct visualization of the fallopian tubes using a novel MRI contrast agent mixture.
    Duan N, Chen X, Yin Y, Wang Z, Chen R.
    Acta Radiol; 2020 Jul; 61(7):1001-1007. PubMed ID: 31684746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in diagnostic work-up of female infertility - comparison with conventional hysterosalpingography: a randomised study.
    Volondat M, Fontas E, Delotte J, Fatfouta I, Chevallier P, Chassang M.
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):501-508. PubMed ID: 29974219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison between X-ray-hysterosalpingography and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography in the assessment of the tubal patency in the cause of female infertility.
    Pace C, Argirò R, Casadei L, Cesareni M, Orlacchio A.
    Radiol Med; 2022 Dec; 127(12):1373-1382. PubMed ID: 36167884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Role of 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in the diagnostic work-up of female infertility.
    Cipolla V, Guerrieri D, Pietrangeli D, Santucci D, Argirò R, de Felice C.
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1132-9. PubMed ID: 26663038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography vs. magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography for diagnosing fallopian tubal patency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chen LS, Zhu ZQ, Li J, Wang ZT, Qiang Y, Hu XY, Zhang MM, Wang ZQ.
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108891. PubMed ID: 32088657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluating Fallopian Tube Patency: What the Radiologist Needs to Know.
    Grigovich M, Kacharia VS, Bharwani N, Hemingway A, Mijatovic V, Rodgers SK.
    Radiographics; 2021 Oct; 41(6):1876-18961. PubMed ID: 34597232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Three-dimensional dynamic MR hysterosalpingography: a preliminary report.
    Wiesner W, Ruehm SG, Bongartz G, Kaim A, Reese E, De Geyter C.
    Eur Radiol; 2001 Oct; 11(8):1439-44. PubMed ID: 11519555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Comparison of assessing the patency of the Fallopian tubes during laparoscopy and during hysterosalpingography on television in infertile women with endometriosis].
    Salata I, Gottwald L, Sobkiewicz S.
    Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):1014-7. PubMed ID: 14674161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The assessment of endometrial pathology and tubal patency: a comparison between the use of ultrasonography and X-ray hysterosalpingography for the investigation of infertility patients.
    Strandell A, Bourne T, Bergh C, Granberg S, Asztely M, Thorburn J.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 14(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 10550881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Investigation of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes using three-dimensional saline sonohysterosalpingography.
    Sankpal RS, Confino E, Matzel A, Cohen LS.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2001 May; 73(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 11336731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Can hysterolaparoscopic mediated chromopertubation obviate the need for hysterosalpingography for proximal tubal blockage?: An experience at a single tertiary care center.
    Agrawal N, Fayyaz S.
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 48(4):241-245. PubMed ID: 29689309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in examination of fallopian tubes in infertile women].
    Bacevac J, Ganović R.
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2001 Apr; 129(9-10):243-6. PubMed ID: 11928602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Sensitivity of hysterosalpingography after tubal surgery.
    Letterie GS, Haggerty MF, Fellows DW.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Apr; 251(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 1386980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. MR hysterosalpingography in a rabbit model.
    Lee FT, Grist TM, Nelson KG, Chosy SG, Rappe AH, Shapiro SS, Kelcz F.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1996 Apr; 6(2):300-4. PubMed ID: 9132095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Assessment of Fallopian tube patency by HyCoSy: comparison of a positive contrast agent with saline solution.
    Boudghène FP, Bazot M, Robert Y, Perrot N, Rocourt N, Antoine JM, Morris H, Leroy JL, Uzan S, Bigot JM.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Nov; 18(5):525-30. PubMed ID: 11844177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in examination of Fallopian tubes in infertile women].
    Bacevac J, Ganović R.
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2001 Nov; 129(1-2):18-21. PubMed ID: 11534279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.