These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

905 related items for PubMed ID: 22677814

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O, Delpierre A.
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Differences in Perception of Musical Stimuli among Acoustic, Electric, and Combined Modality Listeners.
    Prentiss SM, Friedland DR, Nash JJ, Runge CL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):494-501. PubMed ID: 26055838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Discriminability and Perceptual Saliency of Temporal and Spectral Cues for Final Fricative Consonant Voicing in Simulated Cochlear-Implant and Bimodal Hearing.
    Kong YY, Winn MB, Poellmann K, Donaldson GS.
    Trends Hear; 2016 Jun 17; 20():. PubMed ID: 27317666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H, Ballantyne D, Boyle PJ, De Seta E, DeVincentiis M, Mancini P.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Jun 17; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Weighting of Prosodic and Lexical-Semantic Cues for Emotion Identification in Spectrally Degraded Speech and With Cochlear Implants.
    Richter ME, Chatterjee M.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Jun 17; 42(6):1727-1740. PubMed ID: 34294630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T, Fastl H, Baumann U.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Jun 17; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Factors Affecting Bimodal Benefit in Pediatric Mandarin-Speaking Chinese Cochlear Implant Users.
    Liu YW, Tao DD, Chen B, Cheng X, Shu Y, Galvin JJ, Fu QJ.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Jun 17; 40(6):1316-1327. PubMed ID: 30882534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM, Schuchman G, Bernstein JG.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jun 17; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM, Schuchman G, Bernstein JGW.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Jun 17; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Crew JD, Galvin JJ, Fu QJ.
    Trends Hear; 2016 Nov 11; 20():. PubMed ID: 27837051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 46.