These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1008 related items for PubMed ID: 22677815

  • 1. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH, Bentler RA.
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
    Wu YH, Bentler RA.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit.
    Ricketts TA, Hornsby BW.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):472-84. PubMed ID: 14663347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T, Henry P, Gnewikow D.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW, Ricketts TA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part II--field tests.
    Wu YH, Bentler RA.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 19773657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL, Studebaker GA.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, Beck R, Schild C, Hassepass F, Kroeger S, Hocke T, Arndt S.
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC, Wroblewski M, Hajicek J, Rubinstein A.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA, Picou EM.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Predictive measures of directional benefit part 2: verification of different approaches to estimating directional benefit.
    Dittberner AB, Bentler RA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):46-61. PubMed ID: 17204898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
    Shi LF, Doherty KA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH, Stangl E, Bentler RA, Stanziola RW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH, Stangl E, Pang C, Zhang X.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of an adaptive, directional-microphone hearing aid.
    Ricketts T, Henry P.
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Mar; 41(2):100-12. PubMed ID: 12212855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Ear asymmetries and asymmetric directional microphone hearing aid fittings.
    Cord MT, Surr RK, Walden BE, Dittberner AB.
    Am J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 20(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 21764997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Interactions Between Digital Noise Reduction and Reverberation: Acoustic and Behavioral Effects.
    Reinhart P, Zahorik P, Souza P.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 31267958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Kessens JM, Vlaming MS, Houtgast T.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 51.