These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
279 related items for PubMed ID: 22681307
1. Differential time to positivity: vascular catheter drawn cultures for the determination of catheter-related bloodstream infection. Al-Juaid A, Walkty A, Embil J, Crockett M, Karlowsky J. Scand J Infect Dis; 2012 Oct; 44(10):721-5. PubMed ID: 22681307 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving diagnosis of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by using differential time to positivity as a hospital-wide approach at a cancer hospital. Chen WT, Liu TM, Wu SH, Tan TD, Tseng HC, Shih CC. J Infect; 2009 Nov; 59(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 19748520 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How many lumens should be cultured in the conservative diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections? Guembe M, Rodríguez-Créixems M, Sánchez-Carrillo C, Pérez-Parra A, Martín-Rabadán P, Bouza E. Clin Infect Dis; 2010 Jun 15; 50(12):1575-9. PubMed ID: 20455693 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential time to positivity and quantitative cultures for noninvasive diagnosis of catheter-related blood stream infection in children. Acuña M, O'Ryan M, Cofré J, Alvarez I, Benadof D, Rodríguez P, Torres MT, Aguilera L, Santolaya ME. Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2008 Aug 15; 27(8):681-5. PubMed ID: 18600195 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential time to positivity is not predictive for central line-related Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection in routine clinical care. Kaasch AJ, Rieg S, Hellmich M, Kern WV, Seifert H. J Infect; 2014 Jan 15; 68(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 23954613 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity of differential time to positivity compared to pour plates for diagnosing catheter-related blood stream infection: An evaluation in patients with chronic intestinal failure. Chadwick PR, Ryan K, Teubner A, Bond A, Abraham A, Lal S. Clin Nutr; 2020 Aug 15; 39(8):2631-2633. PubMed ID: 31866130 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation between early clinical response after catheter removal and diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection. Shukrallah B, Hanna H, Hachem R, Ghannam D, Chatzinikolaou I, Raad I. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2007 Aug 15; 58(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 17509805 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The comparative accuracy of pooled vs. individual blood culture sampling methods for diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection. Deawtrakulchai P, Cheawchanwattana S, Sribenjalux W, Meesing A. BMC Infect Dis; 2022 Jul 17; 22(1):622. PubMed ID: 35843933 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In situ endoluminal brushing: a safe technique for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection. Dobbins BM, Kite P, Catton JA, Wilcox MH, McMahon MJ. J Hosp Infect; 2004 Nov 17; 58(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15501340 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Which lumen is the source of catheter-related bloodstream infection in patients with multi-lumen central venous catheters? Krause R, Valentin T, Salzer H, Hönigl M, Valentin A, Auner H, Zollner-Schwetz I. Infection; 2013 Feb 17; 41(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 23274928 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized and prospective study of 3 procedures for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection without catheter withdrawal. Bouza E, Alvarado N, Alcalá L, Pérez MJ, Rincón C, Muñoz P. Clin Infect Dis; 2007 Mar 15; 44(6):820-6. PubMed ID: 17304454 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]