These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

440 related items for PubMed ID: 22682095

  • 1. An embedded longitudinal multi-faceted qualitative evaluation of a complex cluster randomized controlled trial aiming to reduce clinically important errors in medicines management in general practice.
    Cresswell KM, Sadler S, Rodgers S, Avery A, Cantrill J, Murray SA, Sheikh A, PINCER Evaluation Team.
    Trials; 2012 Jun 08; 13():78. PubMed ID: 22682095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Description and process evaluation of pharmacists' interventions in a pharmacist-led information technology-enabled multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial for reducing medication errors in general practice (PINCER trial).
    Howard R, Rodgers S, Avery AJ, Sheikh A, PINCER trialists.
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2014 Feb 08; 22(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 23718905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Protocol for the PINCER trial: a cluster randomised trial comparing the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led IT-based intervention with simple feedback in reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management in general practices.
    Avery AJ, Rodgers S, Cantrill JA, Armstrong S, Elliott R, Howard R, Kendrick D, Morris CJ, Murray SA, Prescott RJ, Cresswell K, Sheikh A.
    Trials; 2009 May 01; 10():28. PubMed ID: 19409095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Understanding factors that could influence patient acceptability of the use of the PINCER intervention in primary care: A qualitative exploration using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.
    Laing L, Salema NE, Jeffries M, Shamsuddin A, Sheikh A, Chuter A, Waring J, Avery A, Keers RN.
    PLoS One; 2022 May 01; 17(10):e0275633. PubMed ID: 36240174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Avery AJ, Rodgers S, Cantrill JA, Armstrong S, Cresswell K, Eden M, Elliott RA, Howard R, Kendrick D, Morris CJ, Prescott RJ, Swanwick G, Franklin M, Putman K, Boyd M, Sheikh A.
    Lancet; 2012 Apr 07; 379(9823):1310-9. PubMed ID: 22357106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cost effectiveness of a pharmacist-led information technology intervention for reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management in general practices (PINCER).
    Elliott RA, Putman KD, Franklin M, Annemans L, Verhaeghe N, Eden M, Hayre J, Rodgers S, Sheikh A, Avery AJ.
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Jun 07; 32(6):573-90. PubMed ID: 24639038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Training pharmacists to deliver a complex information technology intervention (PINCER) using the principles of educational outreach and root cause analysis.
    Sadler S, Rodgers S, Howard R, Morris CJ, Avery AJ, PINCER Triallists.
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2014 Feb 07; 22(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 23600928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Design of the POINT study: Pharmacotherapy Optimisation through Integration of a Non-dispensing pharmacist in a primary care Team (POINT).
    Hazen AC, Sloeserwij VM, Zwart DL, de Bont AA, Bouvy ML, de Gier JJ, de Wit NJ, Leendertse AJ.
    BMC Fam Pract; 2015 Jul 02; 16():76. PubMed ID: 26135582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. How do pharmacists in English general practices identify their impact? An exploratory qualitative study of measurement problems.
    Karampatakis GD, Ryan K, Patel N, Lau WM, Stretch G.
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Jan 14; 19(1):34. PubMed ID: 30642315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. General practitioners' perceptions of pharmacists' new services in New Zealand.
    Hatah E, Braund R, Duffull S, Tordoff J.
    Int J Clin Pharm; 2012 Apr 14; 34(2):364-73. PubMed ID: 22359183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Barriers and enablers to collaborative working between GPs and pharmacists: a qualitative interview study.
    Duncan P, Ridd MJ, McCahon D, Guthrie B, Cabral C.
    Br J Gen Pract; 2020 Mar 14; 70(692):e155-e163. PubMed ID: 32041767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Developing a learning health system: Insights from a qualitative process evaluation of a pharmacist-led electronic audit and feedback intervention to improve medication safety in primary care.
    Jeffries M, Keers RN, Phipps DL, Williams R, Brown B, Avery AJ, Peek N, Ashcroft DM.
    PLoS One; 2018 Mar 14; 13(10):e0205419. PubMed ID: 30365508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Examination of England's New Medicine Service (NMS) of complex health care interventions in community pharmacy.
    Latif A, Waring J, Watmough D, Barber N, Chuter A, Davies J, Salema NE, Boyd MJ, Elliott RA.
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2016 Mar 14; 12(6):966-989. PubMed ID: 26806858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.