These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

334 related items for PubMed ID: 22687706

  • 21. [Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in infertile women].
    Vasiljević M, Ganović R, Jovanović R, Marković A.
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1996; 124(5-6):135-8. PubMed ID: 9102833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Diagnosis of fallopian tube patency.
    Shah SM, Towobola OA, Masihleho M.
    East Afr Med J; 2005 Sep; 82(9):457-62. PubMed ID: 16619719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in infertile Iranian women with tubal factor.
    Mohammadbeigi R, Tanhaeivash R.
    Ginekol Pol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):841-3. PubMed ID: 23379192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysis.
    Swart P, Mol BW, van der Veen F, van Beurden M, Redekop WK, Bossuyt PM.
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Sep; 64(3):486-91. PubMed ID: 7641899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Accuracy of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopic hydrotubation in diagnosis of tubal patency.
    Adelusi B, al-Nuaim L, Makanjuola D, Khashoggi T, Chowdhury N, Kangave D.
    Fertil Steril; 1995 May; 63(5):1016-20. PubMed ID: 7720910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Benefit of diagnostic laparoscopy for patients with unexplained infertility and normal hysterosalpingography findings.
    Tsuji I, Ami K, Miyazaki A, Hujinami N, Hoshiai H.
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 2009 Sep; 219(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 19713683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The capacity of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy versus hysterosalpingography to diagnose tubal pathology in the work-up of subfertile women, a randomised clinical trial.
    Tros R, van Kessel MA, van Kuijk SMJ, Oosterhuis GJE, Kuchenbecker WKH, Kwee J, Bongers MY, Mol BWJ, Koks CAM.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 May; 236():127-132. PubMed ID: 30903885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The limited value of hysterosalpingography in assessing tubal status and fertility potential.
    Karande VC, Pratt DE, Rabin DS, Gleicher N.
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Jun; 63(6):1167-71. PubMed ID: 7750583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Hysterosalpingography with selective salpingography.
    Vardhana PA, Silberzweig JE, Guarnaccia M, Sauer MV.
    J Reprod Med; 2009 Mar; 54(3):126-32. PubMed ID: 19370895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Complementary use of hysterosalpingography, hysteroscopy and laparoscopy in 100 infertile patients: results and comparison of their diagnostic accuracy.
    La Sala GB, Sacchetti F, Degl'Incerti-Tocci F, Dessanti L, Torrelli MG.
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1987 Mar; 18(6):369-74. PubMed ID: 2970197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Fallopian tubal patency diagnosed by magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography.
    Ma L, Wu G, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Wang J, Li L, Zhou W.
    J Reprod Med; 2012 Mar; 57(9-10):435-40. PubMed ID: 23091993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Can hysterosalpingocontrast-sonography replace hysterosalpingography in the assessment of tubal subfertility?
    Dijkman AB, Mol BW, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM, Hogerzeil HV.
    Eur J Radiol; 2000 Jul; 35(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10930765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The assessment of endometrial pathology and tubal patency: a comparison between the use of ultrasonography and X-ray hysterosalpingography for the investigation of infertility patients.
    Strandell A, Bourne T, Bergh C, Granberg S, Asztely M, Thorburn J.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 14(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 10550881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Hysterosalpingographic findings in infertility - what has changed over the years?
    Omidiji OA, Toyobo OO, Adegbola O, Fatade A, Olowoyeye OA.
    Afr Health Sci; 2019 Jun; 19(2):1866-1874. PubMed ID: 31656469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Diagnostic accuracy and efficacy of color Doppler mapping for tubal patency.
    Demir B, Kocak M, Beydilli G, Kaplan M, Gelisen O, Haberal A.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Jul; 37(7):782-6. PubMed ID: 21395904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography versus radiographic hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency.
    Hamed HO, Shahin AY, Elsamman AM.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Jun; 105(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 19339010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Frequency of proximal tubal obstruction in patients undergoing infertility evaluation.
    Wadin K, Lönnemark M, Rasmussen C, Magnusson A.
    Acta Radiol; 1994 Jul; 35(4):357-60. PubMed ID: 8011385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Hysterosalpingosonography Is Not as Effective as Hysterosalpingography to Increase Chances of Pregnancy.
    Maheux-Lacroix S, Bergeron C, Moore L, Bergeron MÈ, Lefebvre J, Grenier-Ouellette I, Dodin S.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 May; 41(5):593-598. PubMed ID: 30595514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of infertility: a five years review. (FGAE, 2001 -5).
    Kitilla T.
    Ethiop Med J; 2010 Oct; 48(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 21280428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy, hysteroscopy, and hysterosalpingography in evaluation of female infertility.
    Snowden EU, Jarrett JC, Dawood MY.
    Fertil Steril; 1984 May; 41(5):709-13. PubMed ID: 6232154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.