These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

286 related items for PubMed ID: 2268901

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Tabletability and compactibility of α-lactose monohydrate powders of different particle size. II: predicted relationships.
    Persson AS, Alderborn G.
    Pharm Dev Technol; 2023 Jul; 28(6):509-519. PubMed ID: 37310086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of the use of dry binders in a physical mixture or as a coprocessed dry binder in matrix tablets with extended drug release.
    Mužíková J, Komersová A, Lochař V, Vildová L, Vošoustová B, Bartoš M.
    Acta Pharm; 2018 Sep 01; 68(3):295-311. PubMed ID: 31259696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The compressibility and compactibility of different types of lactose.
    Ilić I, Kása P, Dreu R, Pintye-Hódi K, Srcic S.
    Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2009 Oct 01; 35(10):1271-80. PubMed ID: 19466896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Plastic flow during compression of directly compressible fillers and its effect on tablet strength.
    David ST, Augsburger LL.
    J Pharm Sci; 1977 Feb 01; 66(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 839407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Tabletability and compactibility of α-lactose monohydrate powders of different particle size. I. Experimental comparison.
    Persson AS, Pazesh S, Alderborn G.
    Pharm Dev Technol; 2022 Mar 01; 27(3):319-330. PubMed ID: 35285375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Correlation between compactibility values and excipient cluster size using an in silico approach.
    Martínez L, Betz G, Villalobos R, Melgoza L, Young PM.
    Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2013 Feb 01; 39(2):374-81. PubMed ID: 22568747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Influence of manufacturing process on tabletting ability of powder: comparison between blending, grinding, and spray drying of two formulations made of theophylline and lactose/cellulose or Cellactose.
    Viana M, N'Dri-Stempfer B, Vachon MG, Chulia D.
    Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2002 Feb 01; 28(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 11926355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The influence of particle size on the application of compression and compaction models for tableting.
    Wünsch I, Finke JH, John E, Juhnke M, Kwade A.
    Int J Pharm; 2021 Apr 15; 599():120424. PubMed ID: 33647406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of surface energy on powder compactibility.
    Fichtner F, Mahlin D, Welch K, Gaisford S, Alderborn G.
    Pharm Res; 2008 Dec 15; 25(12):2750-9. PubMed ID: 18548337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Combining experimental design and orthogonal projections to latent structures to study the influence of microcrystalline cellulose properties on roll compaction.
    Dumarey M, Wikström H, Fransson M, Sparén A, Tajarobi P, Josefson M, Trygg J.
    Int J Pharm; 2011 Sep 15; 416(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 21708239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.