These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The patient-centered outcomes research institute should focus on high-impact problems that can be solved quickly. Sox H. Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 Oct; 31(10):2176-82. PubMed ID: 23048093 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A framework for assessing the value of diagnostic imaging in the era of comparative effectiveness research. Gazelle GS, Kessler L, Lee DW, McGinn T, Menzin J, Neumann PJ, van Amerongen D, White LA, Working Group on Comparative Effectiveness Research for Imaging. Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):692-8. PubMed ID: 22095993 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research: from assessing public health benefits to being open with the public. Dubois RW, Graff JS. Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 Dec; 30(12):2235-42. PubMed ID: 22147850 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A flexible approach to evidentiary standards for comparative effectiveness research. Garrison LP, Neumann PJ, Radensky P, Walcoff SD. Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Oct; 29(10):1812-7. PubMed ID: 20921480 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. How the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute can best influence real-world health care decision making. Garber AM. Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 Dec; 30(12):2243-51. PubMed ID: 22147851 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving state Medicaid policies with comparative effectiveness research: a key role for academic health centers. Zerzan JT, Gibson M, Libby AM. Acad Med; 2011 Jun; 86(6):695-700. PubMed ID: 21512359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]