These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

276 related items for PubMed ID: 22743115

  • 21. Comparison between 64-row CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography in the study of lower extremities: personal experience.
    Cernic S, Pozzi Mucelli F, Pellegrin A, Pizzolato R, Cova MA.
    Radiol Med; 2009 Oct; 114(7):1115-29. PubMed ID: 19774439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Kreitner KF, Kalden P, Neufang A, Düber C, Krummenauer F, Küstner E, Laub G, Thelen M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):171-9. PubMed ID: 10628475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Automatic lumen segmentation in calcified plaques: dual-energy CT versus standard reconstructions in comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Thomas C, Korn A, Ketelsen D, Danz S, Tsifikas I, Claussen CD, Ernemann U, Heuschmid M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1590-5. PubMed ID: 20489101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Comparison of gadofosveset-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography for lower-extremity peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Grijalba FU, Esandi MC.
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 20105092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
    Mell M, Tefera G, Thornton F, Siepman D, Turnipseed W.
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):543-8; discussion 548. PubMed ID: 17223303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Intra-arterial MR-angiography on an open-bore MR-scanner compared to digital-subtraction angiography of the infra-popliteal runoff in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Huegli RW, Thalhammer C, Jacob AL, Jaeger K, Bilecen D.
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jun; 66(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 17658713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography.
    Zhang LJ, Wu SY, Niu JB, Zhang ZL, Wang HZ, Zhao YE, Chai X, Zhou CS, Lu GM.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20028901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Modified Dual-Energy Algorithm for Calcified Plaque Removal: Evaluation in Carotid Computed Tomography Angiography and Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Mannil M, Ramachandran J, Vittoria de Martini I, Wegener S, Schmidt B, Flohr T, Krauss B, Valavanis A, Alkadhi H, Winklhofer S.
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Nov; 52(11):680-685. PubMed ID: 28542096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. ECG-triggered non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography (TRANCE) versus digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease of the lower extremities.
    Gutzeit A, Sutter R, Froehlich JM, Roos JE, Sautter T, Schoch E, Giger B, Wyss M, Graf N, von Weymarn C, Jenelten R, Binkert CA, Hergan K.
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Sep; 21(9):1979-87. PubMed ID: 21533632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. 64-slice MDCT angiography of upper extremity in assessment of native hemodialysis access.
    Wasinrat J, Siriapisith T, Thamtorawat S, Tongdee T.
    Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2011 Jan; 45(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 20829241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Magnetic resonance angiography in infrapopliteal arterial disease: prospective comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.
    Diehm N, Kickuth R, Baumgartner I, Srivastav SK, Gretener S, Husmann MJ, Jaccard Y, Do do D, Triller J, Bonel HM.
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):467-76. PubMed ID: 17507820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Pedal angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease: first-pass i.v. contrast-enhanced MR angiography with blood pool contrast medium versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.
    Kos S, Reisinger C, Aschwanden M, Bongartz GM, Jacob AL, Bilecen D.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Mar; 192(3):775-84. PubMed ID: 19234277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Diagnostic performance and radiation dose of lower extremity CT angiography using a 128-slice dual source CT at 80 kVp and high pitch.
    Kim JW, Choo KS, Jeon UB, Kim TU, Hwang JY, Yeom JA, Jeong HS, Choi YY, Nam KJ, Kim CW, Jeong DW, Lim SJ.
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Jul; 57(7):822-8. PubMed ID: 26419254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Stenosis detection with MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts.
    Froger CL, Duijm LE, Liem YS, Tielbeek AV, Donkers-van Rossum AB, Douwes-Draaijer P, Cuypers PW, Buth J, van den Bosch HC.
    Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):284-91. PubMed ID: 15618386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Comparison of the efficacy of digital subtraction and film-screen angiography of the lower limb: prospective study in 50 patients.
    Smith TP, Cragg AH, Berbaum KS, Nakagawa N.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):431-6. PubMed ID: 1729803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.