These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
269 related items for PubMed ID: 22748758
1. Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing. De Groote SL, Raszewski R. Nurs Outlook; 2012; 60(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 22748758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter-rater reliability of h-index scores calculated by Web of Science and Scopus for clinical epidemiology scientists. Walker B, Alavifard S, Roberts S, Lanes A, Ramsay T, Boet S. Health Info Libr J; 2016 Jun; 33(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 27168256 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ranking hepatologists: which Hirsch's h-index to prevent the "e-crise de foi-e"? Poynard T, Thabut D, Jabre P, Munteanu M, Ratziu V, Benhamou Y, Deckmyn O. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2011 May; 35(5):375-86. PubMed ID: 21482219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The difference in referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Anker MS, Hadzibegovic S, Lena A, Haverkamp W. ESC Heart Fail; 2019 Dec; 6(6):1291-1312. PubMed ID: 31886636 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "Publish or Perish" as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities: International case studies in economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history. Baneyx A. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008 Dec; 56(6):363-71. PubMed ID: 19043670 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Google Scholar versus PubMed in locating primary literature to answer drug-related questions. Freeman MK, Lauderdale SA, Kendrach MG, Woolley TW. Ann Pharmacother; 2009 Mar; 43(3):478-84. PubMed ID: 19261965 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Coverage and quality: A comparison of Web of Science and Scopus databases for reporting faculty nursing publication metrics. Powell KR, Peterson SR. Nurs Outlook; 2017 Mar; 65(5):572-578. PubMed ID: 28377037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences between h-index measures from different bibliographic sources and search engines. Barreto ML, Aragão E, Sousa LE, Santana TM, Barata RB. Rev Saude Publica; 2013 Apr; 47(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 24037349 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bibliometric indicators: a snapshot of the scientific productivity of leading European PRM researchers. Franchignoni F, Muñoz Lasa S, Ozçakar L, Ottonello M. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Sep; 47(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 21946402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Capturing citation activity in three health sciences departments: a comparison study of Scopus and Web of Science. Sarkozy A, Slyman A, Wu W. Med Ref Serv Q; 2015 Sep; 34(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 25927511 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [New bibliometric indicators for the scientific literature: an evolving panorama]. La Torre G, Sciarra I, Chiappetta M, Monteduro A. Clin Ter; 2017 Sep; 168(2):e65-e71. PubMed ID: 28383616 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying evidence for public health guidance: a comparison of citation searching with Web of Science and Google Scholar. Levay P, Ainsworth N, Kettle R, Morgan A. Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 26147600 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]