These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
281 related items for PubMed ID: 22748954
1. Trendelenburg position in gynecologic robotic-assisted surgery. Ghomi A, Kramer C, Askari R, Chavan NR, Einarsson JI. J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 22748954 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Nawfal AK, Orady M, Eisenstein D, Wegienka G. J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. Payne TN, Dauterive FR. J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of steep trendelenburg positioning on intraocular pressure during robotic radical prostatectomy. Awad H, Santilli S, Ohr M, Roth A, Yan W, Fernandez S, Roth S, Patel V. Anesth Analg; 2009 Aug; 109(2):473-8. PubMed ID: 19608821 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? Lenihan JP, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U. J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, Johnson PR, Tillmanns TD. Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery according to case type: a 6-year retrospective cohort study using Clavien-Dindo classification. Wechter ME, Mohd J, Magrina JF, Cornella JL, Magtibay PM, Wilson JR, Kho RM. J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014 May; 21(5):844-50. PubMed ID: 24699301 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience. Göçmen A, Sanlıkan F, Uçar MG. Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 21818575 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Steep Trendelenburg position during robotic sacrocolpopexy and heart rate variability. Lowenstein L, Mustafa M, Burke YZ, Mustafa S, Segal D, Weissman A. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jul; 178():66-9. PubMed ID: 24841646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. Advincula AP, Xu X, Goudeau S, Ransom SB. J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the impact of body mass index on the surgical outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy. George A, Eisenstein D, Wegienka G. J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 16(6):730-3. PubMed ID: 19896599 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]