These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Working memory capacity and Stroop interference: global versus local indices of executive control. Meier ME, Kane MJ. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):748-759. PubMed ID: 22774858 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming. Piai V, Roelofs A, van der Meij R. Brain Res; 2012 Apr 23; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference. Augustinova M, Clarys D, Spatola N, Ferrand L. Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr 23; 25(2):767-774. PubMed ID: 29372512 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Carving executive control at its joints: Working memory capacity predicts stimulus-stimulus, but not stimulus-response, conflict. Meier ME, Kane MJ. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov 23; 41(6):1849-72. PubMed ID: 26120774 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Practice on conflict tasks promotes executive function of working memory in the elderly. Osaka M, Yaoi K, Otsuka Y, Katsuhara M, Osaka N. Behav Brain Res; 2012 Jul 15; 233(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 22579495 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of concurrent working memory load on distractor and conflict processing in a name-face Stroop task. Jongen EM, Jonkman LM. Psychophysiology; 2011 Jan 15; 48(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 20525010 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Enduring cognitive dysfunction in unipolar major depression: a test-retest study using the Stroop paradigm. Hammar A, Sørensen L, Ardal G, Oedegaard KJ, Kroken R, Roness A, Lund A. Scand J Psychol; 2010 Aug 15; 51(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 20042028 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]