These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

125 related items for PubMed ID: 22750598

  • 1. Evaluation of two dental impression materials using a robot arm.
    Carvalho A, Brito P, Santos J, Caramelo FJ, Veiga G, Vasconcelos B, Pires JN, Botelho MF.
    Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 2011 Sep 20; 50(1):36-7. PubMed ID: 22750598
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Three Impression Material Classifications: A Comparison.
    Simos S.
    Dent Today; 2017 Mar 20; 36(3):76,78, 80-1. PubMed ID: 29235338
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of implant angulation, material selection, and impression technique on impression accuracy: a preliminary laboratory study.
    Rutkunas V, Sveikata K, Savickas R.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012 Mar 20; 25(5):512-5. PubMed ID: 22930776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. How to take an accurate, stress-free impression.
    Polan MA.
    Dent Today; 2004 Mar 20; 23(3):80, 82-3. PubMed ID: 15060914
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA, Pereira BP.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992 Mar 20; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant.
    Daoudi MF, Setchell DJ, Searson LJ.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar 20; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15058176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A rigid, nondistorting, closed-bite impression tray technique.
    Radz GM, Nash R.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1996 Mar 20; 17(3):230-2, 234-5. PubMed ID: 9051954
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Impression technique for ovate pontics.
    de Vasconcellos DK, Volpato CÂ, Zani IM, Bottino MA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jan 20; 105(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 21194589
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Adhesion of restorations to impression materials.
    Millstein PL, Maya A, Segura JC.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995 Jan 20; 8(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7575963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A simplified impression technique for dental implants.
    Vogel RE.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Mar 20; 23(3 Suppl 1):13-6. PubMed ID: 11913312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Accuracy of three implant impression techniques with different impression materials and stones.
    Chang WG, Vahidi F, Bae KH, Lim BS.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012 Mar 20; 25(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 22259795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy of replacing three tapered transfer impression copings in two elastomeric impression materials.
    Liou AD, Nicholls JI, Yuodelis RA, Brudvik JS.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993 Mar 20; 6(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 8240649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A simple open-tray implant impression technique.
    Windhorn RJ, Gunnell TR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Sep 20; 96(3):220-1. PubMed ID: 16990075
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Elastomeric impression materials].
    Tsoutsos A, Doukoudakis A, Hottel T.
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1985 Sep 20; 39(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 3939456
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Impression technics in complete removable dentures].
    Domken O, Chichoyan F, Prapotnich R.
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2001 Sep 20; 56(3):216-33. PubMed ID: 16193854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.