These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
125 related items for PubMed ID: 22750598
21. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of a combined reversible/irreversible hydrocolloid impression system with other commonly used impression materials. Herring HW, Tames MA, Zardiackas LD. J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Dec; 52(6):795-9. PubMed ID: 6392511 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A predictable and accurate technique with elastomeric impression materials. Barghi N, Ontiveros JC. Am J Dent; 1999 Aug; 12(4):161-3. PubMed ID: 10649919 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Vinylsiloxanether: a new impression material. Clinical study of implant impressions with vinylsiloxanether versus polyether materials. Enkling N, Bayer S, Jöhren P, Mericske-Stern R. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 19793332 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A simplified reliable impression technique using vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. Pameijer CH. J Conn State Dent Assoc; 1983 Oct; 57(4):159-60. PubMed ID: 6421899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of impression technique and material on the accuracy of multiple implant impressions. Wöstmann B, Rehmann P, Balkenhol M. Int J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 21(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 18717085 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials. Hariharan R, Shankar C, Rajan M, Baig MR, Azhagarasan NS. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Oct; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions. Hoyos A, Soderholm KJ. Int J Prosthodont; 2011 Mar; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Analysis of three-dimensional distortion of two impression materials in the transfer of dental implants. Aguilar ML, Elias A, Vizcarrondo CE, Psoter WJ. J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):202-9. PubMed ID: 20362763 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants. Daoudi MF, Setchell DJ, Searson LJ. Int J Prosthodont; 2001 Apr; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Working time of elastomeric impression materials: relevance of rheological tests. Balkenhol M, Kanehira M, Finger WJ, Wöstmann B. Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):347-52. PubMed ID: 18269123 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of the compatibility of elastomeric impression materials, type IV dental stones, and liquid media. Gerrow JD, Schneider RL. J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Mar; 57(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 3553549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. An alternative method of fabricating a custom tray for direct implant impressions. Cura C, Isik FG, Dundar M. Gen Dent; 2011 Mar; 59(1):e22-4. PubMed ID: 21613027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]