These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


217 related items for PubMed ID: 22755701

  • 1. Quantification of scattered radiation in projection mammography: four practical methods compared.
    Salvagnini E, Bosmans H, Struelens L, Marshall NW.
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3167-80. PubMed ID: 22755701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effective detective quantum efficiency for two mammography systems: measurement and comparison against established metrics.
    Salvagnini E, Bosmans H, Struelens L, Marshall NW.
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101916. PubMed ID: 24089918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comprehensive model for x-ray projection imaging system efficiency and image quality characterization in the presence of scattered radiation.
    Monnin P, Verdun FR, Bosmans H, Pérez SR, Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun 23; 62(14):5691-5722. PubMed ID: 28557801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from physical measurements.
    Leon SM, Brateman LF, Wagner LK.
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun 23; 41(6):061901. PubMed ID: 24877812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from use of Monte Carlo simulations and comparison to physical measurements.
    Leon SM, Brateman LF, Wagner LK.
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov 23; 41(11):111914. PubMed ID: 25370647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems.
    Fetterly KA, Schueler BA.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug 21; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of scatter and an antiscatter grid on the performance of a slot-scanning digital mammography system.
    Shen SZ, Bloomquist AK, Mawdsley GE, Yaffe MJ, Elbakri I.
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr 21; 33(4):1108-15. PubMed ID: 16696488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Transmission characteristics of a two dimensional antiscatter grid prototype for CBCT.
    Altunbas C, Kavanagh B, Alexeev T, Miften M.
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug 21; 44(8):3952-3964. PubMed ID: 28513847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Scatter/primary in mammography: Monte Carlo validation.
    Boone JM, Cooper VN.
    Med Phys; 2000 Aug 21; 27(8):1818-31. PubMed ID: 10984229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Scatter dose calculation for anti-scatter linear grids in mammography.
    Al Kafi MA, Maalej N, Naqvi AA.
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 Oct 21; 67(10):1837-41. PubMed ID: 19632851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Improved image quality of cone beam CT scans for radiotherapy image guidance using fiber-interspaced antiscatter grid.
    Stankovic U, van Herk M, Ploeger LS, Sonke JJ.
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun 21; 41(6):061910. PubMed ID: 24877821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Simulated scatter performance of an inverse-geometry dedicated breast CT system.
    Bhagtani R, Schmidt TG.
    Med Phys; 2009 Mar 21; 36(3):788-96. PubMed ID: 19378739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.