These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
107 related items for PubMed ID: 2275648
1. Filter effects and low stimulation rate on the middle-latency response in newborns. Mora JA, Expósito M, Solís C, Barajas JJ. Audiology; 1990; 29(6):329-35. PubMed ID: 2275648 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. 40-Hz steady-state responses in newborns and in children. Maurizi M, Almadori G, Paludetti G, Ottaviani F, Rosignoli M, Luciano R. Audiology; 1990; 29(6):322-8. PubMed ID: 2275647 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequency specificity of the human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses using notched noise masking. Oates PA, Purdy SC. J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):995-1009. PubMed ID: 11519624 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rate and filter effects on the developing middle-latency response. Kraus N, Smith DI, McGee T. Audiology; 1987 Aug; 26(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 3675310 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Frequency specificity of acoustic evoked potentials of early and intermediate latency with high-pass noise masking]. Anft D, Bartsch E, Scholz G, Mrowinski D. HNO; 1998 May; 46(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 9647923 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Auditory brainstem, middle and late latency responses to short gaps in noise at different presentation rates. Alhussaini K, Bohorquez J, Delgado RE, Ozdamar O. Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 29378459 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Choice of a tone-pip envelope for frequency-specific threshold evaluations by means of the middle-latency response: normally hearing subjects and slope of sensorineural hearing loss. Xu ZM, De Vel E, Vinck B, van Cauwenberge PB. Auris Nasus Larynx; 1997 Oct; 24(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 9352823 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip. Kavanagh KT, Harker LA, Tyler RS. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984 Oct; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of high-pass filtering on the detection of the auditory brainstem response. Mason SM. Br J Audiol; 1984 Aug; 18(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 6487849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to toneburst and narrow band CE-chirp in young infants. Rodrigues GR, Ramos N, Lewis DR. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Sep; 77(9):1555-60. PubMed ID: 23915488 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Brain stem (ABR) and middle latency (MLR) auditory evoked responses in infants. Ueda H. Scand Audiol; 1990 Sep; 19(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 2237256 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. High-pass filter settings affect the detectability of MLRs in humans. Kraus N, Reed N, Smith DI, Stein L, Cartee C. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1987 May; 68(3):234-6. PubMed ID: 2436885 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses recorded at fast rates with randomized stimulation. Valderrama JT, de la Torre A, Alvarez IM, Segura JC, Thornton AR, Sainz M, Vargas JL. J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3233. PubMed ID: 25480070 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrophysiological evidence for the critical band in humans: middle-latency responses. Burrows DL, Barry SJ. J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jul; 88(1):180-4. PubMed ID: 2380446 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Conventional and cross-correlation brain-stem auditory evoked responses in the white leghorn chick: rate manipulations. Burkard R, Jones S, Jones T. J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2136-44. PubMed ID: 8201110 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of sleep on the auditory brainstem response (ABR) and the middle latency response (MLR). Osterhammel PA, Shallop JK, Terkildsen K. Scand Audiol; 1985 Apr; 14(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 4059844 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of waveform, latency and amplitude values of chirp ABR in newborns. Cebulla M, Lurz H, Shehata-Dieler W. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 78(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 24529909 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The feasibility of maximum length sequences to reduce acquisition time of the middle latency response. Bell SL, Allen R, Lutman ME. J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1073-81. PubMed ID: 11303921 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses using time domain cross-correlations between interleaved responses. Berninger E, Olofsson A, Leijon A. Ear Hear; 2014 Mar; 35(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 24557002 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials]. Bunke D, von Specht H, Mühler R, Pethe J, Kevanishvili Z. Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]