These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

129 related items for PubMed ID: 22763172

  • 1. An evaluation of the capability of existing and novel serodiagnostic methods for porcine brucellosis to reduce false positive serological reactions.
    McGiven JA, Nicola A, Commander NJ, Duncombe L, Taylor AV, Villari S, Dainty A, Thirlwall R, Bouzelmat N, Perrett LL, Brew SD, Stack JA.
    Vet Microbiol; 2012 Dec 07; 160(3-4):378-86. PubMed ID: 22763172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Diagnostic performance of serological tests for swine brucellosis in the presence of false positive serological reactions.
    Dieste-Pérez L, Blasco JM, de Miguel MJ, Moriyón I, Muñoz PM.
    J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Apr 07; 111():57-63. PubMed ID: 25661496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cell-mediated immune responses differentiate infections with Brucella suis from Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in pigs.
    Riber U, Jungersen G.
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2007 Mar 15; 116(1-2):13-25. PubMed ID: 17270281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Performance of skin tests with allergens from B. melitensis B115 and rough B. abortus mutants for diagnosing swine brucellosis.
    Dieste-Pérez L, Blasco JM, De Miguel MJ, Marín CM, Barberán M, Conde-Álvarez R, Moriyón I, Muñoz PM.
    Vet Microbiol; 2014 Jan 10; 168(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 24331743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Serological relationship between cattle exposed to Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and Escherichia coli O157:H7.
    Nielsen K, Smith P, Widdison J, Gall D, Kelly L, Kelly W, Nicoletti P.
    Vet Microbiol; 2004 May 20; 100(1-2):25-30. PubMed ID: 15135510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A new homogeneous assay for high throughput serological diagnosis of brucellosis in ruminants.
    McGiven JA, Sawyer J, Perrett LL, Brew SD, Commander NJ, Fisher A, McLarnon S, Harper K, Stack JA.
    J Immunol Methods; 2008 Aug 20; 337(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 18579152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Efficacy of several serological tests and antigens for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in the presence of false-positive serological results due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
    Muñoz PM, Marín CM, Monreal D, González D, Garin-Bastuji B, Díaz R, Mainar-Jaime RC, Moriyón I, Blasco JM.
    Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 2005 Jan 20; 12(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 15642999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Differentiation between serological responses to Brucella suis and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 after natural or experimental infection in pigs.
    Jungersen G, Sørensen V, Giese SB, Stack JA, Riber U.
    Epidemiol Infect; 2006 Apr 20; 134(2):347-57. PubMed ID: 16490140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Salmonella enterica Serotype Urbana Interference with Brucellosis Serology.
    Nielsen K, Smith P, Yu WL, Halbert G.
    J Immunoassay Immunochem; 2007 Apr 20; 28(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 17613674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The porcine brucellosis--evidence of the role of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 in occurrence of false positive serological reactions.
    Weiner M, Szulowski K, Iwaniak W.
    Pol J Vet Sci; 2013 Apr 20; 16(1):129-30. PubMed ID: 23691587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Fluorescence polarization assay: Diagnostic evaluation for porcine brucellosis.
    Kalleshamurthy T, Yaranna C, Shekar R, Natesan K, Sahay S, Shome BR, Rahman H, Barbuddhe SB, Barman NN, Das SK, Shome R.
    J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Jan 20; 156():46-51. PubMed ID: 30521866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Serological discrimination by indirect enzyme immunoassay between the antibody response to Brucella sp. and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 in cattle and pigs.
    Nielsen K, Smith P, Yu W, Nicoletti P, Jungersen G, Stack J, Godfroid J.
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2006 Jan 15; 109(1-2):69-78. PubMed ID: 16140390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Improving the specificity of immunodiagnosis for porcine brucellosis.
    Thirlwall RE, Commander NJ, Brew SD, Cutler SJ, McGiven JA, Stack JA.
    Vet Res Commun; 2008 Mar 15; 32(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 17934790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Specificity dependence between serological tests for diagnosing bovine brucellosis in Brucella-free farms showing false positive serological reactions due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
    Mainar-Jaime RC, Muñoz PM, de Miguel MJ, Grilló MJ, Marín CM, Moriyón I, Blasco JM.
    Can Vet J; 2005 Oct 15; 46(10):913-6. PubMed ID: 16454384
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of primary binding assays for presumptive serodiagnosis of swine brucellosis in Argentina.
    Paulo PS, Vigliocco AM, Ramondino RF, Marticorena D, Bissi E, Briones G, Gorchs C, Gall D, Nielsen K.
    Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 2000 Sep 15; 7(5):828-31. PubMed ID: 10973463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 II the use of Yersinia outer proteins for the specific detection of Yersinia enterocolitica infections in ruminants.
    Kittelberger R, Hilbink F, Hansen MF, Ross GP, Joyce MA, Fenwick S, Heesemann J, Wolf-Watz H, Nielsen K.
    Vet Microbiol; 1995 Dec 15; 47(3-4):271-80. PubMed ID: 8748542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of serological tests for the detection of ovine and caprine antibody to Brucella melitensis.
    Nielsen K, Gall D, Smith P, Balsevicius S, Garrido F, Ferrer MD, Biancifiori F, Dajer A, Luna E, Samartino L, Bermudez R, Moreno F, Renteria T, Corral A.
    Rev Sci Tech; 2004 Dec 15; 23(3):979-87. PubMed ID: 15861894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Non specific serological reactions in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: experimental oral infection of cattle with repeated doses of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
    Garin-Bastuji B, Hummel N, Gerbier G, Cau C, Pouillot R, Da Costa M, Fontaine JJ.
    Vet Microbiol; 1999 Apr 19; 66(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 10227124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Serological cross-reactivity between Brucella abortus and yersinia enterocolitica 0:9: IV. Evaluation of the M- and C-epitope antibody response for the specific detection of B. abortus infections.
    Kittelberger R, Bundesen PG, Cloeckaert A, Greiser-Wilke I, Letesson JJ.
    Vet Microbiol; 1998 Feb 15; 60(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 9595626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Assessment of performance of selected serological tests for diagnosing brucellosis in pigs.
    Muñoz PM, Blasco JM, Engel B, de Miguel MJ, Marín CM, Dieste L, Mainar-Jaime RC.
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2012 Apr 15; 146(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 22445082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.