These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

213 related items for PubMed ID: 22773522

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Multifactorial assessment of measurement errors affecting intraoral quantitative sensory testing reliability.
    Moana-Filho EJ, Alonso AA, Kapos FP, Leon-Salazar V, Durand SH, Hodges JS, Nixdorf DR.
    Scand J Pain; 2017 Jul; 16():93-98. PubMed ID: 28850419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The long-term reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in healthy individuals.
    Marcuzzi A, Wrigley PJ, Dean CM, Adams R, Hush JM.
    Pain; 2017 Jul; 158(7):1217-1223. PubMed ID: 28328574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Test-retest agreement and reliability of quantitative sensory testing 1 year after breast cancer surgery.
    Andersen KG, Kehlet H, Aasvang EK.
    Clin J Pain; 2015 May; 31(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 25084072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Test-retest reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing on two sites within the L5 dermatome of the lumbar spine and lower extremity.
    Knutti IA, Suter MR, Opsommer E.
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Sep 05; 579():157-62. PubMed ID: 25064700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Reproducibility and influence of test modality order on thermal perception and thermal pain thresholds in quantitative sensory testing.
    Heldestad V, Linder J, Sellersjö L, Nordh E.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Nov 05; 121(11):1878-85. PubMed ID: 20478739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Test-retest and interobserver reliability of quantitative sensory testing according to the protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): a multi-centre study.
    Geber C, Klein T, Azad S, Birklein F, Gierthmühlen J, Huge V, Lauchart M, Nitzsche D, Stengel M, Valet M, Baron R, Maier C, Tölle T, Treede RD.
    Pain; 2011 Mar 05; 152(3):548-556. PubMed ID: 21237569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Concurrent validity of a low-cost and time-efficient clinical sensory test battery to evaluate somatosensory dysfunction.
    Zhu GC, Böttger K, Slater H, Cook C, Farrell SF, Hailey L, Tampin B, Schmid AB.
    Eur J Pain; 2019 Nov 05; 23(10):1826-1838. PubMed ID: 31325385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Quantitative sensory testing of temperature thresholds: Possible biomarkers for persistent pain?
    Malmström EM, Stjerna J, Högestätt ED, Westergren H.
    J Rehabil Med; 2016 Jan 05; 48(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 26450179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Neurophysiologic and quantitative sensory testing in the diagnosis of trigeminal neuropathy and neuropathic pain.
    Jääskeläinen SK, Teerijoki-Oksa T, Forssell H.
    Pain; 2005 Oct 05; 117(3):349-357. PubMed ID: 16153774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.