These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

329 related items for PubMed ID: 22774858

  • 21. Concurrent working memory task decreases the Stroop interference effect as indexed by the decreased theta oscillations.
    Zhao Y, Tang D, Hu L, Zhang L, Hitchman G, Wang L, Chen A.
    Neuroscience; 2014 Mar 14; 262():92-106. PubMed ID: 24406438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Conflict adaptation: it is not what you expect.
    Duthoo W, Notebaert W.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012 Mar 14; 65(10):1993-2007. PubMed ID: 22670796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Working memory capacity affects the interference control of distractors at auditory gating.
    Tsuchida Y, Katayama J, Murohashi H.
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 May 10; 516(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 22484011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Stroop proactive control and task conflict are modulated by concurrent working memory load.
    Kalanthroff E, Avnit A, Henik A, Davelaar EJ, Usher M.
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun 10; 22(3):869-75. PubMed ID: 25257710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level.
    Bugg JM, Hutchison KA.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr 10; 39(2):433-49. PubMed ID: 22845037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Going, going, gone? Proactive control prevents the congruency sequence effect from rapid decay.
    Duthoo W, Abrahamse EL, Braem S, Notebaert W.
    Psychol Res; 2014 Jul 10; 78(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 24077774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Providing goal reminders eliminates the relationship between working memory capacity and Stroop errors.
    Hood AVB, Hutchison KA.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan 10; 83(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 33165733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Working memory load dissociates contingency learning and item-specific proportion-congruent effects.
    Spinelli G, Krishna K, Perry JR, Lupker SJ.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Nov 10; 46(11):2007-2033. PubMed ID: 32658541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Finding an interaction between Stroop congruency and flanker congruency requires a large congruency effect: A within-trial combination of conflict tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul 10; 82(5):2271-2301. PubMed ID: 31974936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. One night of sleep deprivation affects reaction time, but not interference or facilitation in a Stroop task.
    Cain SW, Silva EJ, Chang AM, Ronda JM, Duffy JF.
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Jun 10; 76(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 21477910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Tracking eye movements to localize Stroop interference in naming: word planning versus articulatory buffering.
    Roelofs A.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep 10; 40(5):1332-47. PubMed ID: 24749961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.