These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

356 related items for PubMed ID: 22788261

  • 1. Developing adolescent-specific health state values for economic evaluation: an application of profile case best-worst scaling to the Child Health Utility 9D.
    Ratcliffe J, Flynn T, Terlich F, Stevens K, Brazier J, Sawyer M.
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Aug 01; 30(8):713-27. PubMed ID: 22788261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Valuing Child Health Utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample: a feasibility study to compare best-worst scaling discrete-choice experiment, standard gamble and time trade-off methods.
    Ratcliffe J, Couzner L, Flynn T, Sawyer M, Stevens K, Brazier J, Burgess L.
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011 Aug 01; 9(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 21033766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Valuing the Child Health Utility 9D: Using profile case best worst scaling methods to develop a new adolescent specific scoring algorithm.
    Ratcliffe J, Huynh E, Chen G, Stevens K, Swait J, Brazier J, Sawyer M, Roberts R, Flynn T.
    Soc Sci Med; 2016 May 01; 157():48-59. PubMed ID: 27060541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Nothing About Us Without Us? A Comparison of Adolescent and Adult Health-State Values for the Child Health Utility-9D Using Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling.
    Ratcliffe J, Huynh E, Stevens K, Brazier J, Sawyer M, Flynn T.
    Health Econ; 2016 Apr 01; 25(4):486-96. PubMed ID: 25689621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Measuring and valuing health-related quality of life among children and adolescents in mainland China--a pilot study.
    Xu F, Chen G, Stevens K, Zhou H, Qi S, Wang Z, Hong X, Chen X, Yang H, Wang C, Ratcliffe J.
    PLoS One; 2014 Apr 01; 9(2):e89222. PubMed ID: 24586607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Estimating a Dutch Value Set for the Pediatric Preference-Based CHU9D Using a Discrete Choice Experiment with Duration.
    Rowen D, Mulhern B, Stevens K, Vermaire JH.
    Value Health; 2018 Oct 01; 21(10):1234-1242. PubMed ID: 30314625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Valuing Child Health Utility 9D Health States with Young Adults: Insights from a Time Trade Off Study.
    Ratcliffe J, Chen G, Stevens K, Bradley S, Couzner L, Brazier J, Sawyer M, Roberts R, Huynh E, Flynn T.
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2015 Oct 01; 13(5):485-92. PubMed ID: 26135244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Scoring the Child Health Utility 9D instrument: estimation of a Chinese child and adolescent-specific tariff.
    Chen G, Xu F, Huynh E, Wang Z, Stevens K, Ratcliffe J.
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Jan 01; 28(1):163-176. PubMed ID: 30374777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The construct validity of the Child Health Utility 9D-DK instrument.
    Petersen KD, Ratcliffe J, Chen G, Serles D, Frøsig CS, Olesen AV.
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Dec 23; 17(1):187. PubMed ID: 31870369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation in adolescence: an assessment of the practicality and validity of the child health utility 9D in the Australian adolescent population.
    Stevens K, Ratcliffe J.
    Value Health; 2012 Dec 23; 15(8):1092-9. PubMed ID: 23244812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. From KIDSCREEN-10 to CHU9D: creating a unique mapping algorithm for application in economic evaluation.
    Chen G, Stevens K, Rowen D, Ratcliffe J.
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Aug 29; 12():134. PubMed ID: 25169558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Mapping CHU9D Utility Scores from the PedsQLTM 4.0 SF-15.
    Mpundu-Kaambwa C, Chen G, Russo R, Stevens K, Petersen KD, Ratcliffe J.
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr 29; 35(4):453-467. PubMed ID: 27928758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Whose values in health? An empirical comparison of the application of adolescent and adult values for the CHU-9D and AQOL-6D in the Australian adolescent general population.
    Ratcliffe J, Stevens K, Flynn T, Brazier J, Sawyer MG.
    Value Health; 2012 Apr 29; 15(5):730-6. PubMed ID: 22867783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Mapping PedsQLTM scores onto CHU9D utility scores: estimation, validation and a comparison of alternative instrument versions.
    Sweeney R, Chen G, Gold L, Mensah F, Wake M.
    Qual Life Res; 2020 Mar 29; 29(3):639-652. PubMed ID: 31745690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Feasibility, reliability and validity of the health-related quality of life instrument Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D) among school-aged children and adolescents in Sweden.
    Lindvall K, Vaezghasemi M, Feldman I, Ivarsson A, Stevens KJ, Petersen S.
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Aug 03; 19(1):193. PubMed ID: 34344386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.