These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

654 related items for PubMed ID: 22805019

  • 1. [Measurement of electrical evoked middle latency response in cochlear implantation operation].
    Wang B, Cao KL, Wang Y, Lu Y.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22805019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluating Auditory Pathway by Electrical Auditory Middle Latency Response and Postoperative Hearing Rehabilitation.
    Wang B, Cao K, Wei C, Gao Z, Li H.
    J Invest Surg; 2019 Sep; 32(6):542-551. PubMed ID: 29537890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A, Gräbel S, Olze H.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of increasing duration of stimulation on the electrically evoked auditory brainstem and middle latency responses in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA.
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 19128593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I, de la Torre A, Sainz M, Roldán C, Schoesser H, Spitzer P.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Detection of the electric brain stem auditory response before cochlear implantation and its significance].
    Wang B, Cao KL, Wei CG, Wang Y, Li H.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Nov 07; 51(11):826-831. PubMed ID: 27938608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Cochlear implantation in patients with auditory neuropathy assisted by intra-operative EABR and the therapeutic effect evaluation].
    Wang B, Cao K, Wei C.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 May 07; 27(10):449-54. PubMed ID: 23937004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H, Cozma S, Boutitie F, Disant F, Truy E, Collet L.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar 07; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The relationship between the intraoperative ECAP threshold and postoperative behavioral levels: the difference between postlingually deafened adults and prelingually deafened pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Morita T, Naito Y, Hirai T, Yamaguchi S, Ito J.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Feb 07; 260(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 12582781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Quantitative analysis of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in implanted children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony.
    Runge-Samuelson CL, Drake S, Wackym PA.
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb 07; 29(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 18025997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception.
    Herrmann BS, Brown MC, Eddington DK, Hancock KE, Lee DJ.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Feb 07; 36(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 25437141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
    Gräbel S, Hirschfelder A, Scheiber C, Olze H.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep 07; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
    Thai-Van H, Truy E, Charasse B, Boutitie F, Chanal JM, Cochard N, Piron JP, Ribas S, Deguine O, Fraysse B, Mondain M, Uziel A, Collet L.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec 07; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: rate effects.
    Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA.
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct 07; 244(1-2):15-24. PubMed ID: 18692122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Differences between electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and behavioral measures in children with cochlear implants operated in the school age vs. operated in the first years of life.
    Vlahović S, Šindija B, Aras I, Glunčić M, Trotić R.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May 07; 76(5):731-9. PubMed ID: 22398117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Frequency-specific electrocochleography indicates that presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms of auditory neuropathy exist.
    McMahon CM, Patuzzi RB, Gibson WP, Sanli H.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun 07; 29(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18344874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
    Firszt JB, Chambers RD, Kraus And N, Reeder RM.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec 07; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of cochlear implant use on the electrically evoked middle latency response in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jun 07; 204(1-2):78-89. PubMed ID: 15925193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.