These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
677 related items for PubMed ID: 22830446
21. A comparison of midwife-led care versus obstetrician-led care for low-risk women in Japan. Iida M, Horiuchi S, Nagamori K. Women Birth; 2014 Sep; 27(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 24906495 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Caseload midwifery compared to standard or private obstetric care for first time mothers in a public teaching hospital in Australia: a cross sectional study of cost and birth outcomes. Tracy SK, Welsh A, Hall B, Hartz D, Lainchbury A, Bisits A, White J, Tracy MB. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Jan 24; 14():46. PubMed ID: 24456576 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A trend analysis in referrals during pregnancy and labour in Dutch midwifery care 1988-2004. Amelink-Verburg MP, Rijnders ME, Buitendijk SE. BJOG; 2009 Jun 24; 116(7):923-32. PubMed ID: 19522796 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan. Kataoka Y, Eto H, Iida M. Midwifery; 2013 Aug 24; 29(8):965-72. PubMed ID: 23415360 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A systematic review comparing continuity of midwifery care with standard maternity services. Waldenström U, Turnbull D. Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Nov 24; 105(11):1160-70. PubMed ID: 9853764 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of the outcomes of partnership caseload midwifery and standard hospital care in low risk mothers. Johnson M, Stewart H, Langdon R, Kelly P, Yong L. Aust J Adv Nurs; 2005 Nov 24; 22(3):21-7. PubMed ID: 16499237 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery care: M@NGO (Midwives @ New Group practice Options). Tracy SK, Hartz D, Hall B, Allen J, Forti A, Lainchbury A, White J, Welsh A, Tracy M, Kildea S. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2011 Oct 26; 11():82. PubMed ID: 22029746 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Is the operative delivery rate in low-risk women dependent on the level of birth care? A randomised controlled trial. Bernitz S, Rolland R, Blix E, Jacobsen M, Sjøborg K, Øian P. BJOG; 2011 Oct 26; 118(11):1357-64. PubMed ID: 21749629 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of the effect of caseload midwifery program and standard midwifery-led care on primiparous birth outcomes: A retrospective cohort matching study. Gidaszewski B, Khajehei M, Gibbs E, Chua SC. Midwifery; 2019 Feb 26; 69():10-16. PubMed ID: 30390462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Change in primary midwife-led care in the Netherlands in 2000-2008: a descriptive study of caesarean sections and other interventions among 789,795 low risk births. Offerhaus PM, de Jonge A, van der Pal-de Bruin KM, Hukkelhoven CW, Scheepers PL, Lagro-Janssen AL. Midwifery; 2014 May 26; 30(5):560-6. PubMed ID: 23890793 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Risks associated with subsequent pregnancy after one caesarean section: A prospective cohort study in a Nigerian obstetric population. Iyoke CA, Ugwu GO, Ezugwu FO, Lawani OL, Onah HE. Niger J Clin Pract; 2014 May 26; 17(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 24909467 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A scoping review of evidence comparing models of maternity care in Australia. Talukdar S, Dingle K, Miller YD. Midwifery; 2021 Aug 26; 99():102973. PubMed ID: 33932707 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The outcome of midwife-led labor in low-risk women within an obstetric referral unit. Ferrazzi E, Visconti E, Paganelli AM, Campi CM, Lazzeri C, Cirillo F, Livio S, Piola C. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Sep 26; 28(13):1530-6. PubMed ID: 25190281 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]