These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


677 related items for PubMed ID: 22830446

  • 41.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Women's experiences of continuity of midwifery care in a randomised controlled trial in Australia.
    Homer CS, Davis GK, Cooke M, Barclay LM.
    Midwifery; 2002 Jun; 18(2):102-12. PubMed ID: 12139908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Midwifery continuity of care and vaginal birth after caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial.
    Homer CSE, Davis DL, Mollart L, Turkmani S, Smith RM, Bullard M, Leiser B, Foureur M.
    Women Birth; 2022 May; 35(3):e294-e301. PubMed ID: 34103270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Organisation of maternity care and choices of mode of birth: a worldwide view.
    Soltani H, Sandall J.
    Midwifery; 2012 Apr; 28(2):146-9. PubMed ID: 22365576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Women's unmet needs in early labour: Qualitative analysis of free-text survey responses in the M@NGO trial of caseload midwifery.
    Allen J, Jenkinson B, Tracy SK, Hartz DL, Tracy M, Kildea S.
    Midwifery; 2020 Sep; 88():102751. PubMed ID: 32512314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Collaboration in maternity care: a randomised controlled trial comparing community-based continuity of care with standard hospital care.
    Homer CS, Davis GK, Brodie PM, Sheehan A, Barclay LM, Wills J, Chapman MG.
    BJOG; 2001 Jan; 108(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 11212998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Women's characteristics and care outcomes of caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study.
    Offerhaus P, Jans S, Hukkelhoven C, de Vries R, Nieuwenhuijze M.
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Sep 07; 20(1):517. PubMed ID: 32894082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.
    Macleod M, Strachan B, Bahl R, Howarth L, Goyder K, Van de Venne M, Murphy DJ.
    BJOG; 2008 Dec 07; 115(13):1688-94. PubMed ID: 19035943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study.
    Murphy DJ, Macleod M, Bahl R, Goyder K, Howarth L, Strachan B.
    BJOG; 2008 Dec 07; 115(13):1695-702; discussion 1702-3. PubMed ID: 19035944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Does team midwife care increase satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum care? A randomized controlled trial.
    Waldenström U, Brown S, McLachlan H, Forster D, Brennecke S.
    Birth; 2000 Sep 07; 27(3):156-67. PubMed ID: 11251496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 34.