These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


315 related items for PubMed ID: 22854397

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Reproducibility and influence of test modality order on thermal perception and thermal pain thresholds in quantitative sensory testing.
    Heldestad V, Linder J, Sellersjö L, Nordh E.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Nov; 121(11):1878-85. PubMed ID: 20478739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Test order of quantitative sensory testing facilitates mechanical hyperalgesia in healthy volunteers.
    Gröne E, Crispin A, Fleckenstein J, Irnich D, Treede RD, Lang PM.
    J Pain; 2012 Jan; 13(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 22208803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Improving QST Reliability--More Raters, Tests, or Occasions? A Multivariate Generalizability Study.
    O'Neill S, O'Neill L.
    J Pain; 2015 May; 16(5):454-62. PubMed ID: 25683899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The interrater and test-retest reliability of 3 modalities of quantitative sensory testing in healthy adults and people with chronic low back pain or rheumatoid arthritis.
    Brady SM, Georgopoulos V, Veldhuijzen van Zanten JJCS, Duda JL, Metsios GS, Kitas GD, Fenton SAM, Walsh DA, McWilliams DF.
    Pain Rep; 2023 Dec; 8(6):e1102. PubMed ID: 37829138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Predicting drug efficacy in chronic low back pain by quantitative sensory tests.
    Schliessbach J, Siegenthaler A, Bütikofer L, Vuilleumier P, Jüni P, Stamer U, Arendt-Nielsen L, Curatolo M.
    Eur J Pain; 2018 May; 22(5):973-988. PubMed ID: 29363217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Test-retest reliability of Quantitative Sensory Testing in knee osteoarthritis and healthy participants.
    Wylde V, Palmer S, Learmonth ID, Dieppe P.
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2011 Jun; 19(6):655-8. PubMed ID: 21329759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Reliability of intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST).
    Pigg M, Baad-Hansen L, Svensson P, Drangsholt M, List T.
    Pain; 2010 Feb; 148(2):220-226. PubMed ID: 20022428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Reliability and validity of quantitative sensory testing in persons with spinal cord injury and neuropathic pain.
    Felix ER, Widerström-Noga EG.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009 Feb; 46(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 19533521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing: a systematic review.
    Moloney NA, Hall TM, Doody CM.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012 Feb; 49(2):191-207. PubMed ID: 22773522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Sensory processing and central pain modulation in patients with chronic shoulder pain: A case-control study.
    Kuppens K, Hans G, Roussel N, Struyf F, Fransen E, Cras P, Van Wilgen CP, Nijs J.
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2018 Mar; 28(3):1183-1192. PubMed ID: 28980347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Development of a Novel Brief Quantitative Sensory Testing Protocol That Integrates Static and Dynamic Pain Assessments: Test-Retest Performance in Healthy Adults.
    De Vita MJ, Buckheit K, Gilmour CE, Moskal D, Maisto SA.
    Pain Med; 2022 Feb 01; 23(2):347-351. PubMed ID: 34601615
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.