These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

120 related items for PubMed ID: 22872178

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Simplified bone-anchored hearing aid insertion using a linear incision without soft tissue reduction.
    Husseman J, Szudek J, Monksfield P, Power D, O'Leary S, Briggs R.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2013 Jul; 127 Suppl 2():S33-8. PubMed ID: 23651553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Calon TG, van Hoof M, van den Berge H, de Bruijn AJ, van Tongeren J, Hof JR, Brunings JW, Jonhede S, Anteunis LJ, Janssen M, Joore MA, Holmberg M, Johansson ML, Stokroos RJ.
    Trials; 2016 Nov 09; 17(1):540. PubMed ID: 27829464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A minimally invasive technique for the implantation of bone-anchored hearing devices.
    Wilson DF, Kim HH.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Sep 09; 149(3):473-7. PubMed ID: 23740414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Minimal access surgery for the Symphonix/Med-El Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear hearing implant.
    Foyt D, Carfrae M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb 09; 27(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 16436985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Punch and Drill: Implantation of Bone Anchored Hearing Device Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus Implantation With Dermatome and Soft Tissue Reduction.
    Dumon T, Medina M, Sperling NM.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Mar 09; 125(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 26384503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Bone-anchored hearing device surgery: a 3- to 6-year follow-up with life table and worst-case scenario calculation.
    Tjellström A, Stalfors J.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul 09; 33(5):891-4. PubMed ID: 22664902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: dermatome versus linear incision technique.
    Strijbos RM, Bom SJH, Zwerver S, Hol MKS.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jan 09; 274(1):109-117. PubMed ID: 27439945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The 8.5mm abutment in children: the Birmingham bone-anchored hearing aid program experience.
    Doshi J, McDermott AL, Reid A, Proops D.
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jun 09; 31(4):612-4. PubMed ID: 20418797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Single minimally invasive surgical technique with an enamel matrix derivative to treat multiple adjacent intra-bony defects: clinical outcomes and patient morbidity.
    Cortellini P, Nieri M, Prato GP, Tonetti MS.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Jul 09; 35(7):605-13. PubMed ID: 18476997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.