These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

252 related items for PubMed ID: 22883359

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Outcome of formocresol/ZOE sub-base pulpotomies utilizing alternative radiographic success criteria.
    Strange DM, Seale NS, Nunn ME, Strange M.
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 11572492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Formocresol, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Portland Cement, and Enamel Matrix Derivative in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies: A Two Year Follow-Up.
    Yildirim C, Basak F, Akgun OM, Polat GG, Altun C.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 26696101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molars after formocresol and electrosurgical pulpotomy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Bahrololoomi Z, Moeintaghavi A, Emtiazi M, Hosseini G.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 18797098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Retrospective record review: reinforced zinc oxide-eugenol pulpotomy: a retrospective study.
    Hui-Derksen EK, Chen CF, Majewski R, Tootla RG, Boynton JR.
    Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 23635897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Mineral trioxide aggregate vs. formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report.
    Eidelman E, Holan G, Fuks AB.
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 11242724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Formocresol versus calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping of human primary molars: two year follow-up.
    Aminabadi NA, Farahani RM, Oskouei SG.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 34(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 20831133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A new haemostatic agent's effect on the success of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in primary molars.
    Odabaş ME, Cinar C, Tulunoğlu O, Işik B.
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(7):529-34. PubMed ID: 22353416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Pulpal therapy for primary teeth: formocresol vs electrosurgery: a clinical study.
    Rivera N, Reyes E, Mazzaoui S, Morón A.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):71-3. PubMed ID: 12762614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of direct pulp capping therapy in primary molar teeth following haemostasis with various antiseptics: a randomised controlled trial.
    Tüzüner T, Alacam A, Altunbas DA, Gokdogan FG, Gundogdu E.
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Dec; 13(4):289-92. PubMed ID: 23270285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.