These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


312 related items for PubMed ID: 22894202

  • 1. Loudness perception of low tones undergoing partial masking by higher tones in orchestral music in concert halls.
    Nishihara N, Hidaka T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):799-803. PubMed ID: 22894202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Lateral reflections are favorable in concert halls due to binaural loudness.
    Lokki T, Pätynen J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL345-51. PubMed ID: 22088039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
    Nelson DA, Fortune TW.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The sound strength parameter G and its importance in evaluating and planning the acoustics of halls for music.
    Beranek L.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3020-6. PubMed ID: 21568405
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Disentangling preference ratings of concert hall acoustics using subjective sensory profiles.
    Lokki T, Pätynen J, Kuusinen A, Tervo S.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3148-61. PubMed ID: 23145600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Loudness growth in forward masking: relation to intensity discrimination.
    Zeng FG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2127-32. PubMed ID: 7963026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Suitable reverberation times for halls for rock and pop music.
    Adelman-Larsen NW, Thompson ER, Gade AC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):247-55. PubMed ID: 20058970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Relationships between preference ratings, sensory profiles, and acoustical measurements in concert halls.
    Kuusinen A, Pätynen J, Tervo S, Lokki T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):239-50. PubMed ID: 24437764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Attenuation of direct sound and the contributions of early reflections within symphony orchestras.
    Dammerud JJ, Barron M.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1755-65. PubMed ID: 20968349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Narrow noise band detection in a complex masker: masking level difference due to harmonicity.
    Deroche ML, Culling JF.
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):225-35. PubMed ID: 21820501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Loudness growth of musically complex stimuli.
    Marshall L.
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 7345056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.