These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

608 related items for PubMed ID: 22905668

  • 1. A clinically relevant validation method for implant placement after virtual planning.
    Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, Schutyser F, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1265-72. PubMed ID: 22905668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
    Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, de Haan AF, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An Accuracy Study of Computer-Planned Implant Placement in the Augmented Maxilla Using Mucosa-Supported Surgical Templates.
    Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Bergé SJ, Soehardi RA, Xi T, de Haan AF, Schutyser F, Maal TJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1154-63. PubMed ID: 25181255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide™)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study.
    Vasak C, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, Strbac G, Schemper M, Zechner W.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Oct; 22(10):1157-1163. PubMed ID: 21244498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Oct; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Accuracy of flapless immediate implant placement in anterior maxilla using computer-assisted versus freehand surgery: A cadaver study.
    Chen Z, Li J, Sinjab K, Mendonca G, Yu H, Wang HL.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1186-1194. PubMed ID: 30346631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: a prospective multicenter study.
    van Steenberghe D, Glauser R, Blombäck U, Andersson M, Schutyser F, Pettersson A, Wendelhag I.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005 Dec; 7 Suppl 1():S111-20. PubMed ID: 16137096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
    Behneke A, Burwinkel M, Behneke N.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical accuracy of flapless computer-guided surgery for implant placement in edentulous arches.
    Vieira DM, Sotto-Maior BS, Barros CA, Reis ES, Francischone CE.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013 Apr; 28(5):1347-51. PubMed ID: 24066327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
    Nickenig HJ, Eitner S.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. An alternative method to match planned and achieved positions of implants, after virtual planning using cone-beam CT data and surgical guide templates--a method reducing patient radiation exposure (part I).
    Nickenig HJ, Eitner S.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 38(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 19939692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.
    Al-Harbi SA, Sun AY.
    Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism.
    Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Jacobs R.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Apr; 37(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 20447264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The use of first stage bone augmentation screws to stabilize the surgical template in the second stage.
    Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 44(6):781-4. PubMed ID: 25682461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
    Fortin T, Camby E, Alik M, Isidori M, Bouchet H.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Flapless implant surgery in the edentulous jaw based on three fixed intraoral reference points and image-guided surgical templates: accuracy in human cadavers.
    Widmann G, Zangerl A, Keiler M, Stoffner R, Bale R, Puelacher W.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Aug; 21(8):835-41. PubMed ID: 20345381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.