These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

337 related items for PubMed ID: 22915681

  • 1. Comparison of a rebound tonometer with an applanation tonometer in dogs with glaucoma.
    Slack JM, Stiles J, Moore GE.
    Vet Rec; 2012 Oct 13; 171(15):373. PubMed ID: 22915681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical comparison of the TonoVet(®) rebound tonometer and the Tono-Pen Vet(®) applanation tonometer in dogs and cats with ocular disease: glaucoma or corneal pathology.
    von Spiessen L, Karck J, Rohn K, Meyer-Lindenberg A.
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan 13; 18(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 24131625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between the Tono-Pen XL® and Perkins® applanation tonometers in dogs and cats.
    Andrade SF, Palozzi RJ, Giuffrida R, de Campos RJ, Santos Gde C, Fukui RM.
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar 13; 15 Suppl 1():14-20. PubMed ID: 22050624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of the use of new handheld tonometers and established applanation tonometers in dogs.
    Görig C, Coenen RT, Stades FC, Djajadiningrat-Laanen SC, Boevé MH.
    Am J Vet Res; 2006 Jan 13; 67(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 16426223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Validation of the TonoVet® rebound tonometer in normal and glaucomatous cats.
    McLellan GJ, Kemmerling JP, Kiland JA.
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar 13; 16(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 22672669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes.
    García-Resúa C, González-Meijome JM, Gilino J, Yebra-Pimentel E.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb 13; 83(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 16501412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements in dogs using two different tonometers and plano therapeutic soft contact lenses.
    Ahn JT, Jeong MB, Park YW, Kim SE, Ahn JS, Lee YR, Lee ER, Seo K.
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar 13; 15 Suppl 1():83-8. PubMed ID: 22192568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by use of a rebound tonometer and applanation tonometer in dogs before and after elective phacoemulsification.
    Thompson-Hom AL, Gerding PA.
    Am J Vet Res; 2012 May 13; 73(5):709-13. PubMed ID: 22533404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using rebound (TonoVet® ) and applanation (TonoPen-XL® ) tonometry in clinically normal alpacas (Vicugña pacos).
    McDonald JE, Knollinger AM, Dustin Dees D, MacLaren NE.
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar 13; 20(2):155-159. PubMed ID: 27111099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Comparative study of two portable tonometers: Tono-Pen XL and Perkins].
    Andrada Márquez MT, Fesser Oroz I, Antón López A.
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2003 Apr 13; 78(4):189-96. PubMed ID: 12743842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.