These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT images of different voxel resolutions used to detect simulated small internal resorption cavities. Kamburoğlu K, Kursun S. Int Endod J; 2010 Sep; 43(9):798-807. PubMed ID: 20609023 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparative study of the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiographic modalities for the detection of noncavitated caries. Krzyżostaniak J, Kulczyk T, Czarnecka B, Surdacka A. Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Apr; 19(3):667-72. PubMed ID: 25059712 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film. Ozen T, Kamburoğlu K, Cebeci AR, Yüksel SP, Paksoy CS. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 18996725 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Secondary caries detection by DIAGNOdent and radiography: a comparative in vitro study. Bamzahim M, Shi XQ, Angmar-Månsson B. Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 15124784 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The effects of different restorative materials on the detection of approximal caries in cone-beam computed tomography scans with and without metal artifact reduction mode. Cebe F, Aktan AM, Ozsevik AS, Ciftci ME, Surmelioglu HD. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Mar; 123(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 28111155 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions. Haiter-Neto F, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jan; 37(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 18195250 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations. Alptekin T, Ozer F, Unlu N, Cobanoglu N, Blatz MB. Oper Dent; 2010 Jan; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film. Møystad A, Svanaes DB, Risnes S, Larheim TA, Gröndahl HG. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with intraoral radiography for the detection of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions. Krzyżostaniak J, Surdacka A, Kulczyk T, Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska M, Owecka M. Caries Res; 2014 Sep; 48(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 24852420 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Willems G. Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. In vitro comparison of high-definition US, CBCT and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of proximal and recurrent caries. Şeker O, Kamburoğlu K, Şahin C, Eratam N, Çakmak EE, Sönmez G, Özen D. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Dec 01; 50(8):20210026. PubMed ID: 33979235 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]