These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary artery intervention in patients on chronic hemodialysis: does a drug-eluting stent have an impact on clinical outcome? Manabe S, Shimokawa T, Fukui T, Fumimoto KU, Ozawa N, Seki H, Takanashi S. J Card Surg; 2009; 24(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 19438773 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of one-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndromes (from the CUSTOMIZE Registry). Caggegi A, Capodanno D, Capranzano P, Chisari A, Ministeri M, Mangiameli A, Ronsivalle G, Ricca G, Barrano G, Monaco S, Di Salvo ME, Tamburino C. Am J Cardiol; 2011 Aug 01; 108(3):355-9. PubMed ID: 21545992 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonrandomized comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in octogenarians. Rodés-Cabau J, Deblois J, Bertrand OF, Mohammadi S, Courtis J, Larose E, Dagenais F, Déry JP, Mathieu P, Rousseau M, Barbeau G, Baillot R, Gleeton O, Perron J, Nguyen CM, Roy L, Doyle D, De Larochellière R, Bogaty P, Voisine P. Circulation; 2008 Dec 02; 118(23):2374-81. PubMed ID: 19029471 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of the introduction of drug-eluting stents on the clinical practice of surgical and percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease. van Domburg RT, Lemos PA, Takkenberg JJ, Liu TK, van Herwerden LA, Arampatzis CA, Smits PC, Daemen J, Venema AC, Serruys PW, Bogers AJ. Eur Heart J; 2005 Apr 02; 26(7):675-81. PubMed ID: 15637087 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Five-year outcomes in patients with left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in the synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery trial. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Ståhle E, Colombo A, Mack MJ, Holmes DR, Choi JW, Ruzyllo W, Religa G, Huang J, Roy K, Dawkins KD, Mohr F. Circulation; 2014 Jun 10; 129(23):2388-94. PubMed ID: 24700706 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Javaid A, Steinberg DH, Buch AN, Corso PJ, Boyce SW, Pinto Slottow TL, Roy PK, Hill P, Okabe T, Torguson R, Smith KA, Xue Z, Gevorkian N, Suddath WO, Kent KM, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Waksman R. Circulation; 2007 Sep 11; 116(11 Suppl):I200-6. PubMed ID: 17846304 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Coronary artery bypass surgery is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis. Sunagawa G, Komiya T, Tamura N, Sakaguchi G, Kobayashi T, Murashita T. Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Jun 11; 89(6):1896-900; discussion 1900. PubMed ID: 20494045 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative one-year effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients <75 versus ≥75 years with unprotected left main disease (from the CUSTOMIZE Registry). Capodanno D, Caggegi A, Capranzano P, Milino V, Chisari A, Mangiameli A, Monaco S, Barrano G, Di Salvo ME, Tamburino C. Am J Cardiol; 2012 Nov 15; 110(10):1452-8. PubMed ID: 22853983 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Early and late outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for dialysis patients. Terazawa S, Tajima K, Takami Y, Tanaka K, Okada N, Usui A, Ueda Y. J Card Surg; 2012 May 15; 27(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 22500723 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison by meta-analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with a mean age of ≥70 years. Alam M, Virani SS, Shahzad SA, Siddiqui S, Siddiqui KH, Mumtaz SA, Kleiman NS, Coselli JS, Lakkis NM, Jneid H. Am J Cardiol; 2013 Sep 01; 112(5):615-22. PubMed ID: 23726179 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients. 1-year results of the CARDia (Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes) trial. Kapur A, Hall RJ, Malik IS, Qureshi AC, Butts J, de Belder M, Baumbach A, Angelini G, de Belder A, Oldroyd KG, Flather M, Roughton M, Nihoyannopoulos P, Bagger JP, Morgan K, Beatt KJ. J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Feb 02; 55(5):432-40. PubMed ID: 20117456 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. PCI versus CABG for multivessel coronary disease in diabetics. Tarantini G, Ramondo A, Napodano M, Favaretto E, Gardin A, Bilato C, Nesseris G, Tarzia V, Cademartiri F, Gerosa G, Iliceto S. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Jan 01; 73(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 19089938 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved long-term survival for diabetic patients with surgical versus interventional revascularization. Kurlansky P, Herbert M, Prince S, Mack MJ. Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Apr 01; 99(4):1298-305. PubMed ID: 25686668 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]