These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

235 related items for PubMed ID: 22920696

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
    Wiranto MG, Engelbrecht WP, Tutein Nolthenius HE, van der Meer WJ, Ren Y.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses.
    Naidu D, Scott J, Ong D, Ho CT.
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 20043542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
    Nouri M, Massudi R, Bagheban AA, Azimi S, Fereidooni F.
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Validity and reliability of tooth size and dental arch measurements: a stereo photogrammetric study.
    Al-Khatib AR, Rajion ZA, Masudi SM, Hassan R, Townsend GC.
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 22866590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.
    Zhang F, Suh KJ, Lee KM.
    PLoS One; 2016 May; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Examination of Bolton Index comparing the traditional method with a 2-dimensional digital measurement method.
    Roşu S, Zetu I, Ogodescu A, Veiszenbacher E, Mártha KI.
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2014 May; 118(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 24741801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The evidence supporting methods of tooth width measurement: Part II. Digital models and intra-oral scanners.
    Naidu D, Freer TJ.
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 Nov; 29(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 24380136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Determination of tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton ratios using Bibliocast Cécile3 digital models.
    Watanabe-Kanno GA, Abrão J, Junior HM, Sánchez-Ayala A, Lagravère MO.
    Int Orthod; 2010 Sep; 8(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 20739241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner.
    Camardella LT, Breuning H, de Vasconcellos Vilella O.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):211-220. PubMed ID: 28074260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.