These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

235 related items for PubMed ID: 22920696

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts?
    Dowling AH, Burns A, Macauley D, Garvey TM, Fleming GJ.
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 24012518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. On the augmented reproducibility in measurements on 3D orthodontic digital dental models and the definition of feature points.
    Jacquet W, Nyssen E, Ibel G, Vannet BV.
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 23785935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.
    Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. A proposal for soft tissue landmarks for craniofacial analysis using 3-dimensional laser scan imaging.
    Baik HS, Lee HJ, Lee KJ.
    World J Orthod; 2006 Jul; 7(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 16548301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study.
    Asquith J, Gillgrass T, Mossey P.
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 17974542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models.
    Watanabe-Kanno GA, Abrão J, Miasiro Junior H, Sánchez-Ayala A, Lagravère MO.
    Braz Oral Res; 2009 Oct; 23(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 19893964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Registration accuracy in the integration of laser-scanned dental images into maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Noh H, Nabha W, Cho JH, Hwang HS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):585-91. PubMed ID: 21967948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Tooth-size discrepancy: a comparison between manual and digital methods.
    Correia GD, Habib FA, Vogel CJ.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014 Oct; 19(4):107-13. PubMed ID: 25279529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Digital versus plaster study models: how accurate and reproducible are they?
    Abizadeh N, Moles DR, O'Neill J, Noar JH.
    J Orthod; 2012 Sep; 39(3):151-9. PubMed ID: 22984099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.