These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


237 related items for PubMed ID: 22930776

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Accuracy of various impression materials and methods for two implant systems: An effect size study.
    Schmidt A, Häussling T, Rehmann P, Schaaf H, Wöstmann B.
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 29191609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH, Lim YJ, Yim SH, Kim CW.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Apr; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material.
    Assif D, Nissan J, Varsano I, Singer A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999 Apr; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The effect of impression technique and implant angulation on the impression accuracy of external- and internal-connection implants.
    Mpikos P, Kafantaris N, Tortopidis D, Galanis C, Kaisarlis G, Koidis P.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Apr; 27(6):1422-8. PubMed ID: 23189292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
    Hahn SM, Millstein PL, Kinnunen TH, Wright RF.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Comparison of the transfer precision of three different impression materials in combination with transfer caps for the Frialit-2 system.
    Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Penkner K, Polansky R, Sedaj B, Wegscheider WA.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Jul; 27(7):629-38. PubMed ID: 10931257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Effects of implant angulation, impression material, and variation in arch curvature width on implant transfer model accuracy.
    Akalin ZF, Ozkan YK, Ekerim A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013 Jul; 28(1):149-57. PubMed ID: 23377060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.