These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

226 related items for PubMed ID: 2294261

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Snap-Gauge band compared to RigiScan Plus in a nocturnal penile tumescence study for evaluation of erectile dysfunction.
    Mizuno I, Fuse H, Fujiuchi Y.
    Urol Int; 2003; 71(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 12845270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Snap-Gauge band versus penile rigidity in impotence assessment.
    Ellis DJ, Doghramji K, Bagley DH.
    J Urol; 1988 Jul; 140(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 3379699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Screening assessment of penile tumescence and rigidity. Clinical test of Snap-Gauge.
    Condra M, Fenemore J, Reid K, Phillips P, Morales A, Owen J, Surridge D.
    Urology; 1987 Mar; 29(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 3824719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. New concept parameters of RigiScan in differentiation of vascular erectile dysfunction: is it a useful test?
    Basar MM, Atan A, Tekdogan UY.
    Int J Urol; 2001 Dec; 8(12):686-91. PubMed ID: 11851769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of erectile dysfunction with continuous monitoring of penile rigidity.
    Kaneko S, Bradley WE.
    J Urol; 1986 Nov; 136(5):1026-9. PubMed ID: 3773061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Utility of Rigiscan and papaverine in diagnosis of erectile impotence.
    Weinberg JJ, Badlani GH.
    Urology; 1988 Jun; 31(6):526-9. PubMed ID: 2453968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The unreliability of nocturnal penile tumescence recording as an outcome measurement in the treatment of organic impotence.
    Condra M, Morales A, Surridge DH, Owen JA, Marshall P, Fenemore J.
    J Urol; 1986 Feb; 135(2):280-2. PubMed ID: 3944859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evidence based assessment of erectile dysfunction.
    Broderick GA.
    Int J Impot Res; 1998 May; 10 Suppl 2():S64-73; discussion S77-9. PubMed ID: 9647964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Erection problems in medical practice: differential diagnosis with relatively simple method.
    Slob AK, Blom JH, van der Werff ten Bosch JJ.
    J Urol; 1990 Jan; 143(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 2294260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Analysis of nocturnal penile tumescence with continuous monitoring of penile rigidity].
    Kaneko S, Mizunaga M, Miyata M, Yachiku S, Kurita T, Bradley WE.
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Dec; 81(12):1889-95. PubMed ID: 2292823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.