These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Geographic variation in female preference functions and male songs of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Simmons LW, Zuk M, Rotenberry JT. Evolution; 2001 Jul; 55(7):1386-94. PubMed ID: 11525462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Selective phonotaxis to high sound-pulse rate in the cricket Gryllus assimilis. Pollack GS, Kim JS. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2013 Apr; 199(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 23322447 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Phonotaxis in flying crickets. I. Attraction to the calling song and avoidance of bat-like ultrasound are discrete behaviors. Nolen TG, Hoy RR. J Comp Physiol A; 1986 Oct; 159(4):423-39. PubMed ID: 3783496 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Acoustic signalling for mate attraction in crickets: Abdominal ganglia control the timing of the calling song pattern. Jacob PF, Hedwig B. Behav Brain Res; 2016 Aug 01; 309():51-66. PubMed ID: 27109338 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Temperature coupling in cricket acoustic communication. I. Field and laboratory studies of temperature effects on calling song production and recognition in Gryllus firmus. Pires A, Hoy RR. J Comp Physiol A; 1992 Aug 01; 171(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 1403992 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Temporal and directional processing by an identified interneuron, ON1, compared in cricket species that sing with different tempos. Tunstall DN, Pollack GS. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2005 Apr 01; 191(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 15668779 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal resolution for calling song signals by female crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus. Schneider E, Hennig RM. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2012 Mar 01; 198(3):181-91. PubMed ID: 22086085 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Critical song features for auditory pattern recognition in crickets. Meckenhäuser G, Hennig RM, Nawrot MP. PLoS One; 2013 Mar 01; 8(2):e55349. PubMed ID: 23437054 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Temperature coupling in cricket acoustic communication. II. Localization of temperature effects on song production and recognition networks in Gryllus firmus. Pires A, Hoy RR. J Comp Physiol A; 1992 Aug 01; 171(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 1403993 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Physical and temporal scaling considerations in a robot model of cricket calling song preference. Lund HH, Webb B, Hallam J. Artif Life; 1998 Aug 01; 4(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 9798277 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Phonotaxis in flying crickets. II. Physiological mechanisms of two-tone suppression of the high frequency avoidance steering behavior by the calling song. Nolen TG, Hoy RR. J Comp Physiol A; 1986 Oct 01; 159(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 3783497 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]