These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

232 related items for PubMed ID: 22946775

  • 1. LMA ProSeal(TM) vs. i-Gel(TM) in ventilated children: a randomised, crossover study using the size 2 mask.
    Gasteiger L, Brimacombe J, Oswald E, Perkhofer D, Tonin A, Keller C, Tiefenthaler W.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Nov; 56(10):1321-4. PubMed ID: 22946775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
    Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C.
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks.
    Van Zundert TC, Brimacombe JR.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2012 Jan; 63(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 22783708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study.
    Brimacombe J, Keller C.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2003 Jan; 20(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12553391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of guided insertion of the LMA ProSeal vs the i-gel.
    Gasteiger L, Brimacombe J, Perkhofer D, Kaufmann M, Keller C.
    Anaesthesia; 2010 Sep; 65(9):913-6. PubMed ID: 20645948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Randomized crossover study assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiber optic positioning : Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ versus Laryngeal Tube LTS II™ size 2 in non-paralyzed anesthetized children.
    Gasteiger L, Ofner S, Stögermüller B, Ziegler B, Brimacombe J, Keller C.
    Anaesthesist; 2016 Aug; 65(8):585-9. PubMed ID: 27380049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)- Proseal and the LMA-Classic in ventilated children receiving neuromuscular blockade.
    Lardner DR, Cox RG, Ewen A, Dickinson D.
    Can J Anaesth; 2008 Jan; 55(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 18166745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effects of head flexion on airway seal, quality of ventilation and orogastric tube placement using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
    Xue FS, Mao P, Liu HP, Yang QY, Li CW, He N, Xu YC, Liao X.
    Anaesthesia; 2008 Sep; 63(9):979-85. PubMed ID: 18699873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children.
    Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T, Morimura N, Noguchi M, Hiroki K.
    Br J Anaesth; 2004 Oct; 93(4):528-31. PubMed ID: 15298876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.
    Maitra S, Baidya DK, Arora MK, Bhattacharjee S, Khanna P.
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():298-305. PubMed ID: 27555181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children.
    Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J.
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 15(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 15725321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A randomised trial comparing the i-gel (TM) with the LMA Classic (TM) in children.
    Lee JR, Kim MS, Kim JT, Byon HJ, Park YH, Kim HS, Kim CS.
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 22352745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cricoid pressure impedes insertion of, and ventilation through, the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, paralyzed patients.
    Li CW, Xue FS, Xu YC, Liu Y, Mao P, Liu KP, Yang QY, Zhang GH, Sun HT.
    Anesth Analg; 2007 May; 104(5):1195-8, tables of contents. PubMed ID: 17456674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway.
    Timmermann A, Cremer S, Eich C, Kazmaier S, Bräuer A, Graf BM, Russo SG.
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Feb; 110(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 19194153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A randomized crossover comparison between the Laryngeal Mask Airway-Unique™ and the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway in children.
    Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Mankoo R, Langen KE, Mandler T.
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Feb; 22(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 21917058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients.
    Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D, Urwyler N, Luyet C, Vogt A, Greif R, Unibe MM.
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Jul; 111(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 19512881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of Proseal LMA with i-Gel in children under controlled ventilation: a prospective randomised clinical study.
    Shiveshi P, Anandaswamy TC.
    Braz J Anesthesiol; 2022 Jul; 72(2):247-252. PubMed ID: 33823205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The size 1(1/2) ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway.
    Goldmann K, Roettger C, Wulf H.
    Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):405-10. PubMed ID: 16428533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.
    Anand LK, Goel N, Singh M, Kapoor D.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2016 Jun; 54(2):44-50. PubMed ID: 27106162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A randomised comparison of the LMA SupremeTM and LMAProSealTM in children.
    Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Sawardekar A, Gordon J, Langen KE, Anderson K.
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):632-9. PubMed ID: 22420717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.