These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

174 related items for PubMed ID: 22947623

  • 1. Effect of varying displays and room illuminance on caries diagnostic accuracy in digital dental radiographs.
    Pakkala T, Kuusela L, Ekholm M, Wenzel A, Haiter-Neto F, Kortesniemi M.
    Caries Res; 2012; 46(6):568-74. PubMed ID: 22947623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of ambient light and monitor brightness and contrast settings on the detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs: an in vitro study.
    Hellén-Halme K, Petersson A, Warfvinge G, Nilsson M.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Oct; 37(7):380-4. PubMed ID: 18812599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of display type, DICOM calibration and room illuminance in bitewing radiographs.
    Kallio-Pulkkinen S, Huumonen S, Haapea M, Liukkonen E, Sipola A, Tervonen O, Nieminen MT.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016 Oct; 45(1):20150129. PubMed ID: 26234536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of monitors on approximal caries detection in digital radiographs--standard versus precalibrated DICOM part 14 displays: an in vitro study.
    Hellén-Halme K, Nilsson M, Petersson A.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 May; 107(5):716-20. PubMed ID: 19201219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N, Mohassel AR, Imanimoghaddam M, Moazzami SM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec 01; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Is the digital radiographic detection of approximal caries lesions influenced by viewing conditions?
    Lima CAS, Nascimento EHL, Gaêta-Araujo H, Oliveira-Santos C, Freitas DQ, Haiter-Neto F, Oliveira ML.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Feb 01; 129(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 31474575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries.
    Castro VM, Katz JO, Hardman PK, Glaros AG, Spencer P.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Mar 01; 36(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 17463097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.
    Haak R, Wicht MJ, Nowak G, Hellmich M.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul 01; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Grey-scale reversed radiographic display in the detection of approximal caries.
    Haak R, Wicht MJ.
    J Dent; 2005 Jan 01; 33(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 15652170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
    Hintze H, Wenzel A, Frydenberg M.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May 01; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.