These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

157 related items for PubMed ID: 22962046

  • 1. Pulse wave velocity and the non-invasive methods used to assess it: Complior, SphygmoCor, Arteriograph and Vicorder.
    Davies JM, Bailey MA, Griffin KJ, Scott DJ.
    Vascular; 2012 Dec; 20(6):342-9. PubMed ID: 22962046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of aortic pulse wave velocity measured by three techniques: Complior, SphygmoCor and Arteriograph.
    Rajzer MW, Wojciechowska W, Klocek M, Palka I, Brzozowska-Kiszka M, Kawecka-Jaszcz K.
    J Hypertens; 2008 Oct; 26(10):2001-7. PubMed ID: 18806624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Current assessment of pulse wave velocity: comprehensive review of validation studies.
    Milan A, Zocaro G, Leone D, Tosello F, Buraioli I, Schiavone D, Veglio F.
    J Hypertens; 2019 Aug; 37(8):1547-1557. PubMed ID: 30882597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Pulse wave analysis using the Mobil-O-Graph, Arteriograph and Complior device: a comparative study.
    Benas D, Kornelakis M, Triantafyllidi H, Kostelli G, Pavlidis G, Varoudi M, Vlastos D, Lambadiari V, Parissis J, Ikonomidis I.
    Blood Press; 2019 Apr; 28(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 30668163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A new oscillometric method for assessment of arterial stiffness: comparison with tonometric and piezo-electronic methods.
    Baulmann J, Schillings U, Rickert S, Uen S, Düsing R, Illyes M, Cziraki A, Nickering G, Mengden T.
    J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 26(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 18300864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The Vicorder device compared with SphygmoCor in the assessment of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in patients with peripheral arterial disease.
    Shahin Y, Barakat H, Barnes R, Chetter I.
    Hypertens Res; 2013 Mar; 36(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 23034469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of the Complior Analyse device with Sphygmocor and Complior SP for pulse wave velocity and central pressure assessment.
    Stea F, Bozec E, Millasseau S, Khettab H, Boutouyrie P, Laurent S.
    J Hypertens; 2014 Apr; 32(4):873-80. PubMed ID: 24509122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Reproducibility of arterial stiffness and wave reflections in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the contribution of lung hyperinflation and a comparison of techniques.
    Stone IS, John L, Petersen SE, Barnes NC.
    Respir Med; 2013 Nov; 107(11):1700-8. PubMed ID: 23920329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Short-Term Repeatability of Noninvasive Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity Assessment: Comparison Between Methods and Devices.
    Grillo A, Parati G, Rovina M, Moretti F, Salvi L, Gao L, Baldi C, Sorropago G, Faini A, Millasseau SC, Scalise F, Carretta R, Salvi P.
    Am J Hypertens; 2017 Dec 08; 31(1):80-88. PubMed ID: 29059329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A novel device for measuring arterial stiffness using finger-toe pulse wave velocity: Validation study of the pOpmètre®.
    Alivon M, Vo-Duc Phuong T, Vignon V, Bozec E, Khettab H, Hanon O, Briet M, Halimi JM, Hallab M, Plichart M, Mohammedi K, Marre M, Boutouyrie P, Laurent S.
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2015 Apr 08; 108(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 25682547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of pulse wave velocity assessed by three different techniques: Arteriograph, Complior, and Echo-tracking.
    Mihalcea DJ, Florescu M, Suran BM, Enescu OA, Mincu RI, Magda S, Patrascu N, Vinereanu D.
    Heart Vessels; 2016 Apr 08; 31(4):568-77. PubMed ID: 25633054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Repeatability of the measurement of aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) in the clinical assessment of arterial stiffness in community-dwelling older patients using the Vicorder(®) device.
    McGreevy C, Barry M, Bennett K, Williams D.
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2013 Apr 08; 73(4):269-73. PubMed ID: 23544457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A magnetic resonance perspective of the pulse wave transit time by the Arteriograph device and potential for improving aortic length estimation for central pulse wave velocity.
    Rezai MR, Cowan BR, Sherratt N, Finn JD, Wu FC, Cruickshank JK.
    Blood Press Monit; 2013 Apr 08; 18(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 23324879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of two instruments measuring carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: Vicorder versus SphygmoCor.
    van Leeuwen-Segarceanu EM, Tromp WF, Bos WJ, Vogels OJ, Groothoff JW, van der Lee JH.
    J Hypertens; 2010 Aug 08; 28(8):1687-91. PubMed ID: 20498619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of arterial stiffness indices measured by the Colins and SphygmoCor systems.
    Youn JC, Kim JY, Park S, Kwon J, Lee HS, Shin DH, Lee SH, Kang SM, Hoon Son N, Jang Y.
    Hypertens Res; 2012 Dec 08; 35(12):1180-4. PubMed ID: 22833159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Measurement of pulse wave velocity in children: comparison of volumetric and tonometric sensors, brachial-femoral and carotid-femoral pathways.
    Keehn L, Milne L, McNeill K, Chowienczyk P, Sinha MD.
    J Hypertens; 2014 Jul 08; 32(7):1464-9; discussion 1469. PubMed ID: 24759123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Assessment of arterial stiffness in hypertension: comparison of oscillometric (Arteriograph), piezoelectronic (Complior) and tonometric (SphygmoCor) techniques.
    Jatoi NA, Mahmud A, Bennett K, Feely J.
    J Hypertens; 2009 Nov 08; 27(11):2186-91. PubMed ID: 19834344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Methods for assessing arterial stiffness: technical considerations.
    Tomlinson LA.
    Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens; 2012 Nov 08; 21(6):655-60. PubMed ID: 22895411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Validating a new oscillometric device for aortic pulse wave velocity measurements in children and adolescents.
    Kracht D, Shroff R, Baig S, Doyon A, Jacobi C, Zeller R, Querfeld U, Schaefer F, Wühl E, Schmidt BM, Melk A, 4C Study Consortium.
    Am J Hypertens; 2011 Dec 08; 24(12):1294-9. PubMed ID: 21866186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Measurement of central augmentation index by three different methods and techniques: Agreement among Arteriograph, Complior, and Mobil-O-Graph devices.
    Papaioannou TG, Thymis J, Benas D, Triantafyllidi H, Kostelli G, Pavlidis G, Kousathana F, Katogiannis K, Vlastos D, Lambadiari V, Papadavid E, Parissis J, Tousoulis D, Ikonomidis I.
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2019 Sep 08; 21(9):1386-1392. PubMed ID: 31465154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.