These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
312 related items for PubMed ID: 22964013
1. An investigation into PEEK-on-PEEK as a bearing surface candidate for cervical total disc replacement. Kraft M, Koch DK, Bushelow M. Spine J; 2012 Jul; 12(7):603-11. PubMed ID: 22964013 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Are PEEK-on-Ceramic Bearings an Option for Total Disc Arthroplasty? An In Vitro Tribology Study. Siskey R, Ciccarelli L, Lui MK, Kurtz SM. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2428-2440. PubMed ID: 27677290 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro assessment of wear particulate generated from NUBAC: a PEEK-on-PEEK articulating nucleus replacement device: methodology and results from a series of wear tests using different motion profiles, test frequencies, and environmental conditions. Brown T, Bao QB, Agrawal CM, Hallab NJ. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec 15; 36(26):E1675-85. PubMed ID: 21494194 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Models that incorporate spinal structures predict better wear performance of cervical artificial discs. Bhattacharya S, Goel VK, Liu X, Kiapour A, Serhan HA. Spine J; 2011 Aug 15; 11(8):766-76. PubMed ID: 21802999 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Biotribology of PEEK-on-HXLPE Bearings Is Comparable to Traditional Bearings on a Multidirectional Pin-on-disk Tester. Baykal D, Siskey RS, Underwood RJ, Briscoe A, Kurtz SM. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov 15; 474(11):2384-2393. PubMed ID: 27457625 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns. O'Leary P, Nicolakis M, Lorenz MA, Voronov LI, Zindrick MR, Ghanayem A, Havey RM, Carandang G, Sartori M, Gaitanis IN, Fronczak S, Patwardhan AG. Spine J; 2005 Nov 15; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Polymer-on-metal or metal-on-polymer total disc arthroplasty: does it make a difference? Moghadas PM, Shepherd DE, Hukins DW, Mahomed A. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct 01; 37(21):1834-8. PubMed ID: 22498992 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A biomimetic artificial intervertebral disc system composed of a cubic three-dimensional fabric. Shikinami Y, Kawabe Y, Yasukawa K, Tsuta K, Kotani Y, Abumi K. Spine J; 2010 Feb 01; 10(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 19944651 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of a metal-on-metal cervical intervertebral disc prosthesis. Colle KO, Butler JB, Reyes PM, Newcomb AG, Theodore N, Crawford NR. Spine J; 2013 Nov 01; 13(11):1640-9. PubMed ID: 24094992 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of self-mating PEEK as an alternative bearing material for cervical disc arthroplasty: a comparison of different simulator inputs and tribological environments. Brown T, Bao QB. Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun 01; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S717-26. PubMed ID: 22415761 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Alternative bearing materials for intervertebral disc arthroplasty. Grupp TM, Meisel HJ, Cotton JA, Schwiesau J, Fritz B, Blömer W, Jansson V. Biomaterials; 2010 Jan 01; 31(3):523-31. PubMed ID: 19815271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Dmitriev A, Hu N, Woo Kim S, Cappuccino A, Pimenta L. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct 15; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]