These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
279 related items for PubMed ID: 22971261
21. Factors associated with long-term vertical skeletal changes induced by facemask therapy in patients with Class III malocclusion. Kwak HJ, Park HJ, Kim YJ, Lee DY. Angle Orthod; 2018 Mar; 88(2):157-162. PubMed ID: 29131663 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Sagittal and vertical effects of rapid maxillary expansion in Class I, II, and III occlusions. Farronato G, Giannini L, Galbiati G, Maspero C. Angle Orthod; 2011 Mar; 81(2):298-303. PubMed ID: 21208083 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of facemask therapy effects using skeletal and tooth-borne anchorage. Lee HJ, Choi DS, Jang I, Cha BK. Angle Orthod; 2022 May 01; 92(3):307-314. PubMed ID: 34964848 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents. Chen L, Chen R, Yang Y, Ji G, Shen G. Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb 01; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Rapid maxillary expansion compared to surgery for assistance in maxillary face mask protraction. Küçükkeleş N, Nevzatoğlu S, Koldaş T. Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan 01; 81(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 20936953 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Combined rapid maxillary expansion and protraction facemask in the treatment of Class III malocclusions in growing children: a prospective long-term study. Williams MD, Sarver DM, Sadowsky PL, Bradley E. Semin Orthod; 1997 Dec 01; 3(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 9573888 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Three-dimensional alterations in pharyngeal airway and maxillary sinus volumes in Class III maxillary deficiency subjects undergoing orthopedic facemask treatment. Pamporakis P, Nevzatoğlu Ş, Küçükkeleş N. Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul 01; 84(4):701-7. PubMed ID: 24417494 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of maxillary protraction and fixed appliance therapy in Class III patients. Arman A, Ufuk Toygar T, Abuhijleh E. Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug 01; 28(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 16731542 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Long-term stability of Class III treatment: rapid palatal expansion and protraction facemask vs LeFort I maxillary advancement osteotomy. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Janisse FN, Bayirli B. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan 01; 131(1):7.e9-19. PubMed ID: 17208098 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the short-term effects of facemask therapy preceded by conventional rapid maxillary expansion or by an alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions protocol : A retrospective study. Akbulut S, Yilmaz S, Yagci A. J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Sep 01; 84(5):278-286. PubMed ID: 35257194 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Maxillary protraction with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask versus skeletal anchorage with mini-implants in class III patients: a non-randomized clinical trial. de Souza RA, Rino Neto J, de Paiva JB. Prog Orthod; 2019 Sep 02; 20(1):35. PubMed ID: 31475309 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Effectiveness of reverse twin block with lip pads-RME and face mask with RME in the early treatment of class III malocclusion. Minase RA, Bhad WA, Doshi UH. Prog Orthod; 2019 Apr 08; 20(1):14. PubMed ID: 30957212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Dentofacial and skeletal effects of two orthodontic maxillary protraction protocols: bone anchors versus facemask. Tabellion M, Lisson JA. Head Face Med; 2024 Oct 18; 20(1):60. PubMed ID: 39425193 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Skeletal response to maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate before age 10 years. Tindlund RS. Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1994 Jul 18; 31(4):295-308. PubMed ID: 7918525 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Long-term stability of rapid maxillary expansion combined with chincup protraction followed by fixed appliances. Palma JC, Tejedor-Sanz N, Oteo MD, Alarcón JA. Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar 18; 85(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24892796 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of double-plate appliance/facemask combination and facemask therapy in treating class III malocclusions. Gencer D, Kaygisiz E, Yüksel S, Tortop T. Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar 18; 85(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 24913739 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Facemask therapy with and without expansion. Tortop T, Keykubat A, Yuksel S. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct 18; 132(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 17920499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Soft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with maxillary expansion and protraction headgear treatment. Ngan P, Hägg U, Yiu C, Merwin D, Wei SH. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jan 18; 109(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 8540481 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Dentofacial effects of two facemask therapies for maxillary protraction. Ge YS, Liu J, Chen L, Han JL, Guo X. Angle Orthod; 2012 Nov 18; 82(6):1083-91. PubMed ID: 22639823 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Mandibular cervical headgear vs rapid maxillary expander and facemask for orthopedic treatment of Class III malocclusion. Baccetti T, Rey D, Angel D, Oberti G, McNamara JA. Angle Orthod; 2007 Jul 18; 77(4):619-24. PubMed ID: 17605494 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]