These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

131 related items for PubMed ID: 22976403

  • 41. Religion, politics, and abortion.
    Perry MJ.
    Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 2001; 79(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 16538743
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Abortion in America: is compromise possible?
    Hodges SA.
    J Legal Stud; 2001; 10():175-89. PubMed ID: 15991406
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. The future of abortion.
    Flynn T.
    Free Inq; 1989; 9():44-6. PubMed ID: 16100826
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Children not meant to be: protecting the interests of the child when abortion results in live birth.
    Casagrande KM.
    Quinnipiac Health Law J; 2002; 6(1):19-55. PubMed ID: 16180297
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Fetal pain, abortion, viability, and the Constitution.
    Cohen IG, Sayeed S.
    J Law Med Ethics; 2011; 39(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 21561518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last.
    Siano JR.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Life and death before birth: 4D ultrasound and the shifting frontiers of the abortion debate.
    Savell K.
    J Law Med; 2007 Aug; 15(1):103-16. PubMed ID: 17902493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Blurred Lines: Disentangling the Concept of Fetal Viability from Abortion Law.
    Han L, Rodriguez MI, Caughey AB.
    Womens Health Issues; 2018 Aug; 28(4):287-288. PubMed ID: 29622285
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. The regulatory cliff edge between contraception and abortion: the legal and moral significance of implantation.
    Sheldon S.
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 41(9):762-5. PubMed ID: 26085334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Anti-abortion myths.
    New Humanist; 1977 Sep; 92(5):175-8. PubMed ID: 11661521
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Opposition to abortion related to inaccurate beliefs about fetal pain perception in utero.
    Harcourt E, Bering J, Gullam J.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Aug; 61(4):599-603. PubMed ID: 33894010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. The problem of fetal pain and abortion: toward an ethical consensus for appropriate behavior.
    Brugger EC.
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2012 Sep; 22(3):263-87. PubMed ID: 23285794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Abortion--child capable of being born alive. Rance v. Mid-Downs Health Authority.
    Hutchesson P.
    New Law J; 1990 Mar 09; 140(6446):325-6. PubMed ID: 16041876
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.