These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

182 related items for PubMed ID: 22978896

  • 1. A correlational method to concurrently measure envelope and temporal fine structure weights: effects of age, cochlear pathology, and spectral shaping.
    Fogerty D, Humes LE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1679-89. PubMed ID: 22978896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Perceptual weighting of individual and concurrent cues for sentence intelligibility: frequency, envelope, and fine structure.
    Fogerty D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):977-88. PubMed ID: 21361454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Perceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech.
    Fogerty D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):489-500. PubMed ID: 21786914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D, Kewley-Port D, Humes LE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1667-78. PubMed ID: 22978895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background.
    Lee JH, Humes LE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1700-17. PubMed ID: 22978898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping.
    Fogerty D, Bologna WJ, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):1133. PubMed ID: 28253707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Saripella R, Loizou PC, Thibodeau L, Alford JA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
    Anderson MC, Arehart KH, Kates JM.
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Acoustic and perceptual effects of amplitude and frequency compression on high-frequency speech.
    Alexander JM, Rallapalli V.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):908. PubMed ID: 28863610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O, Pentony S, Kalluri S, Edwards B.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility.
    Mehraei G, Gallun FJ, Leek MR, Bernstein JG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):301-16. PubMed ID: 24993215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effects of hearing loss on the subcortical representation of speech cues.
    Anderson S, Parbery-Clark A, White-Schwoch T, Drehobl S, Kraus N.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3030-8. PubMed ID: 23654406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB, Riss D, Liepins R, Rader T, Keck T, Keintzel T, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.
    Oxenham AJ, Kreft HA.
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct 13; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW, Walden TC.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr 13; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.
    Carroll J, Tiaden S, Zeng FG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct 13; 130(4):2054-62. PubMed ID: 21973360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    D'Aquila LA, Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Oct 13; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The role of segmentation difficulties in speech-in-speech understanding in older and hearing-impaired adults.
    Woodfield A, Akeroyd MA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul 13; 128(1):EL26-31. PubMed ID: 20649185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.